Hopkins says you dont become great off of sympathy, is GGG great middleweight?

[robertzimmerman]

He's a not man enough to move up. You know that.

What's that based on, Einstein?

Just because he hasn't done so yet because he's got things to accomplish at MW first?

[robertzimmerman]

Man moved up his 40's and became

Lineal champ
2-time Ring champ

Unified wba/ibf champ

WBC champ

that is down right amazing

Concentrate on the first part of your post.

[Real King Kong]

Man moved up his 40's and became

Lineal champ
2-time Ring champ

Unified wba/ibf champ

WBC champ

that is down right amazing

His greatness is magnified cuz of the age...but as far as opposition and wins vs losses at 175...it's really not that impressive. I was a big hopkins fan just cuz of his skills and know how...but it's hard to get over that post tito period where he fought **** fights on hbo and then lost to taylor. I was pissed watching those fights...he bought into his own hype that he was this cerebral tactician, and forgot what got him there. Watching him do almost nothing against taylor made me sick.

[CaneloMaidana]

You have to be one of the worst posters on this forum.

You're obsessed.

A coward?

Ha!

Yeah, get yourself down to your local boxing gym.

Why is he a coward?

Because he hasn't moved up yet?

You're a joke.

Golovkin is the biggest jokes in boxing gyms. You see local guys will move up 12 pounds like it's nothing. Golovkin is a protected little coward.

[robertzimmerman]

Hopkins already fought Kovalev but the gutless coward Golovkin won't.

Shut up you clown.

I cringe at everyone of your posts.

You are an absolute embarrassment who has no concept of anything.


Bernard fought Kov at 50. And whilst he deserves enormous respect for it, he would never have fought a Kovalev type opponent in his prime.

Go and recap his career:

He waited 6 years for King's tournament.

He remained at the weight for 5 years AFTER he'd beaten Tito, even though there was nothing left to accomplish and there were better fighters at SMW-LHW.

He wouldn't rematch Roy at a CW.

We don't know if he'd have moved up for Tarver, had he have beaten Taylor.

He did not take risks in his prime.

When he did move up, he had nothing to lose and everything to gain.

[CaneloMaidana]

What's that based on, Einstein?

Just because he hasn't done so yet because he's got things to accomplish at MW first?

He has 1 fight till 35. He's never moving up because people like you baby her. Paulie is a 2 division champ, Golovkin is not. It's because he lacks courage.

[robertzimmerman]

Jacobs is not a risk, a risk is moving up or going in as huge dog. Jacobs legit as can be but don't act like Golovkin won't be 6 to 1 favorite.

Yes, he is a risk.

[CaneloMaidana]

Shut up you clown.

I cringe at everyone of your posts.

You are an absolute embarrassment who has no concept of anything.


Bernard fought Kov at 50. And whilst he deserves enormous respect for it, he would never have fought a Kovalev type opponent in his prime.

Go and recap his career:

He waited 6 years for King's tournament.

He remained at the weight for 5 years AFTER he'd beaten Tito, even though there was nothing left to accomplish and there were better fighters at SMW-LHW.

He wouldn't rematch Roy at a CW.

We don't know if he'd have moved up for Tarver, had he have beaten Taylor.

He did not take risks in his prime.

When he did move up, he had nothing to lose and everything to gain.

He fought Roy Jones you moron. Golovkin wouldn't fight prime Roy Jones Jr for 100 million. You protect Golovkin because of racism.

[CaneloMaidana]

Yes, he is a risk.

Daniel Jacobs is a risk but prime Roy Jones wasn't? You're a scumbag.

[robertzimmerman]

Golovkin is the biggest jokes in boxing gyms. You see local guys will move up 12 pounds like it's nothing. Golovkin is a protected little coward.

A fighter sadly died last week, but here you are calling fighters cowards due to an agenda.

Pathetic.