-
-
at least you're evolving
manny pacquiao was significantly smaller than floyd mayweather. floyd didn't do enough to distance himself, consdiering that gap in size. yes, he won head to head. yes, his longevity at 147 and 154 make his resume better there. but he wasn't a f#cking flyweight, was he? and he didn't have wins over all time greats in their primes, did he?
the argument is quite simple, and it's one you don't understand:
similar tier of accoomplishments and opponents, BUT ONE GUY WAS SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER THAN THE OTHER, and therefor had a better resume.Comment
-
Damn GGG stans trying to discredit a guy with a great resume like floyd is hilarious......GGG doesn't even have a better win than Jesus Chavez and these morons wanna talk crap. SmhComment
-
when you move up in weight, being the smaller guy is expectedat least you're evolving
manny pacquiao was significantly smaller than floyd mayweather. floyd didn't do enough to distance himself, consdiering that gap in size. yes, he won head to head. yes, his longevity at 147 and 154 make his resume better there. but he wasn't a f#cking flyweight, was he? and he didn't have wins over all time greats in their primes, did he?
the argument is quite simple, and it's one you don't understand:
similar tier of accoomplishments and opponents, BUT ONE GUY WAS SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER THAN THE OTHER, and therefor had a better resume.
mayweather moved up 4 times....do you think he was the bigger man in all his fights?
give it up....this isn't about mayweather he is proven......far more proven than fighters you guys love
just be realistic and admit you don't like the guy and don't use muc logic when it comes to anything involving him.
GGG hasn't taken any risks in comparison...deal with itComment
-
at least you're evolving
manny pacquiao was significantly smaller than floyd mayweather. floyd didn't do enough to distance himself, consdiering that gap in size. yes, he won head to head. yes, his longevity at 147 and 154 make his resume better there. but he wasn't a f#cking flyweight, was he? and he didn't have wins over all time greats in their primes, did he?
the argument is quite simple, and it's one you don't understand:
similar tier of accoomplishments and opponents, BUT ONE GUY WAS SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER THAN THE OTHER, and therefor had a better resume.
Comment
-
how in the PHAK does Floyd tells other fighters to take a risk! when in the Phak did Floyd ever take a risk himself? he retired in 2009 when cotto, pakiao, and many other fighters were on there prime! Floyd is so full of CHIT! yeah Floyd berto was a real RISK! GTFOH!Comment
-
i spent more than you probably make in a couple weeks to see floyd mayweather fight canelo in vegas
you might just be dumb enough to think you dictate what other people like. i'm not a fanboy like you. i'm just honest. use the search function if you really think i'm a golovkin fanboy. that you attribute fanboyism to anybody who disagrees with you is just that, fanboysim.
go look at the floyd - pacquiao racewar threads from the height of the feud ['10-15 or so] and you will not find me posting. you'll find yourself, dunn, larry, gruber, supporting floyd in every f#cking conversation in every f#cking thread. you may think that you don't look biased when you support floyd in every single instance [and i genuinely don't and invite you to look, BTW] but i'm not that dumb.Comment
-
spare me the extra stuffi spent more than you probably make in a couple weeks to see floyd mayweather fight canelo in vegas
you might just be dumb enough to think you dictate what other people like. i'm not a fanboy like you. i'm just honest. use the search function if you really think i'm a golovkin fanboy. that you attribute fanboyism to anybody who disagrees with you is just that, fanboysim.
go look at the floyd - pacquiao racewar threads from the height of the feud ['10-15 or so] and you will not find me posting. you'll find yourself, dunn, larry, gruber, supporting floyd in every f#cking conversation in every f#cking thread. you may think that you don't look biased when you support floyd in every single instance [and i genuinely don't and invite you to look, BTW] but i'm not that dumb.
keep it simple
mayweather is a proven all time great that was criticized for whoever he shared the ring with. even though in 49 fights he fought at a high level with Half of the fights being for world titles or vs former world champions
you same posters defending GGG not moving up, claimed a guy who moved up 4 times and fought at a high level to age 38 took no risks
makes you guys sound ******ed.
GGG is being Hyped....for what? 3-4 champions beaten in 35+ fights.....Mayweather was a 3 division champion with over 10 defenses of those belts......was in his mid 20s with 35 fights
Floyd won his first title...lineal at that....vs a man that was undefeated at the weight....with only 17 fights and 21 years old....that's a risk bro!!!
Mayweather made a point that you guys hate, its even worse considering how much you dislike him
to your dismay....mayweather is right...GGG needs to take some risks to be considered greatComment
Tweet
Comment