Proof GGG is the greatest current boxer

**Lester Tutor** · 09-12-2016, 11:33 PM

**Sledgeweather17** · 09-13-2016, 01:28 AM

Originally posted by Deletrious

Take a scroll down the threads. Chocalito just won a belt in a fourth division and approaches Mayweather's win record, two top 5 p4p fighters are nearing a fight in a month.

What are all the forums about?
GGG

I was kind of on the outside of this with Mayweather, but now I get it, the best fighter is by definition controversial.

What people said now and then:
Mayweather/ggg dodge challenging fights (Pacquiao-margarito/Ward)

He's got flaws in his abilities, may has no power/ggg can be hit.

His fans are blind to the truth.

The next fight is always about to expose may/ggg.

His fan base only like him because of their shared race.

And I'm sure there are more.

The fact that so many people are compelled to form threads with no point but to try and drag ggg down actually proves that boxing is coming to revolve around him the way it did with Mayweather. If you actually felt he was a hype job/ protected fighter, you would ignore him.

There are plenty of fighters like that in the business of boxing, so how can ggg engender 90% of the random hate? Because if you're wrong you'll be on the wrong side of history on one of the greats. So it's not good enough to ignore him, you have to actively attack him.

You are without a shadow of doubt the dumbest troll on this site, that or you have tunnel vision.

I seem to remember clearly that there were hundreds of threads on here when Frampton beat Cruz. I also seem to remember hundreds of the same when Spence beat Algieri AND when he beat Bundu, yes, Bundu!

And how many were there again when Thurman fought Porter? Yeah, just as many if not more than GGG-Brook threads.

Even now already there are Canelo-Liam Smith threads already replacing the GGG threads, and there will be hundreds more again when Ward - Kovalev is near. The only fight that probably won't have a lot of threads is Klitschko - Fury. People don't seem all that interested for some reason in that one, maybe it's because of how much of a staring contest the first one was.

**GGGroupies** · 09-13-2016, 02:22 AM

Sorry but great boxers move up when they have nothing but bums in their weight class.

**Straight Up** · 09-13-2016, 02:24 AM

i like GGG but him fighting a welterweight doesn't make him a great fighter. he should be fighting bigger men not smaller men.

**bwilson** · 09-13-2016, 02:44 AM

I like Golovkin too but I still have Gonzalez and the winner of Kovalev-Ward ranked higher.

**TheBoxingXpert** · 09-13-2016, 02:45 AM

Lol, he's nowhere near being the best in the world.

**hugh grant** · 09-13-2016, 03:46 AM

Originally posted by Straight Up

i like GGG but him fighting a welterweight doesn't make him a great fighter. he should be fighting bigger men not smaller men.

No it doesn't cos GGG was great before fighting brook. But GGG showed how a great fighter is supposed to deal with very good wws. A lot of 160 wouldn't have shown that
. haglrrr didn't exactly show how greast he was beating former lightweights

**fighter1234** · 09-13-2016, 06:28 AM

**hugh grant** · 09-13-2016, 06:32 AM

Hag!er has a better resume than GGG. But GGG beats hagler. Similar to khan having better resume than brook, but brook beats khan.

When GGG beats defense record of 20 or so, GGG becomes greatest middleweight ever.

Proof GGG is the greatest current boxer