Golovkin's best win vs. Wilder's best win

[Kigali]

Brook > Stiverne.

No

Stiverne is a tank...

Brook was hurt by Shenchenko(destroyed by Malinaggi) and Carson Jones.

Anybody that gets hurt by a Malinaggi victim is not all that.

[BodiesInFlight]

Wilder has fought tough warriors like areolla and molina

He's fought slick Americans like Malik Scott

GGG only fights brit hype jobs and eurobums

It's clear who is better

[Scipio2009]

Bermane Stiverne and Kell Brook are their best wins. There can be no doubt that Brook is a better fighter than Stiverne, but it can't be ignored that Brook was moving up 2 weight classes, which makes the wins comparable. So which win do you regard higher? Brook moving up 2 weight classes or Stivene?

EDIT: The subject here is NOT who got the better resume, so STFU about that. The subject is: Who of them got the one better defining win?

Simple check:

Where did you have Bermaine Stiverne rated at heavayweight when he fought Wilder? Where would you have had Kell Brook rated at middleweight when he fought Golovkin?

Bermaine Stiverne was a top 5 heavyweight when he fought Wilder; I don't think that anyone would've call Kell Brook (arguably in the top 3 at 147) a top-5 middleweight.

[Raonic]

No

Stiverne is a tank...

Brook was hurt by Shenchenko(destroyed by Malinaggi) and Carson Jones.

Anybody that gets hurt by a Malinaggi victim is not all that.

Stiverne was alright but Brook was much better.

[LoadedWraps]

Bermane Stiverne and Kell Brook are their best wins. There can be no doubt that Brook is a better fighter than Stiverne, but it can't be ignored that Brook was moving up 2 weight classes, which makes the wins comparable. So which win do you regard higher? Brook moving up 2 weight classes or Stivene?

EDIT: The subject here is NOT who got the better resume, so STFU about that. The subject is: Who of them got the one better defining win?

Wilder has beaten shoe shiners and part-time shovel salesman. Golovkin has taken down hungry lions and grizzled champions.

/thread

[BoxingFan85]

GGG has 4 years on Wilder

Give him time.

He could have had Povetkin on his list but the Russian was dirty.

Could have, would have doesn't count mate.. Should have is the only thing that counts.. You don't get credits for fights that haven't happened.. Wilder has been ducking Wlad for ages now.. Wlad had asked to fight Wilder in '12, and even after Wilder won the belt.. So yeah nobody is a newbie to the game here..

[TheBoxingXpert]

That has nothing to do with the topic. TS asks a very basic question and we have 2 pages of people who act like they can't read. It's downright childish that people are so insecure as fans that they can't answer the question without adding all sort of fanboy shyt.

It's downright pathetic. I've never seen a race with such a low confidence as the white race. I mean, seriously, I ask who got the better win and because Wilder got the better win, then they need to make many pages with reasons why we should remember that the white guy is still best, lol.

[TheBoxingXpert]

Simple check:

Where did you have Bermaine Stiverne rated at heavayweight when he fought Wilder? Where would you have had Kell Brook rated at middleweight when he fought Golovkin?

Bermaine Stiverne was a top 5 heavyweight when he fought Wilder; I don't think that anyone would've call Kell Brook (arguably in the top 3 at 147) a top-5 middleweight.

That's a good point. Stiverne was a champ and had wins against Arreola and a high KO percentage. Brook was not even a real middleweight. It's pretty clear that Stiverne was a better win.

[////]

What makes Brook a better win than Lemeiux?

Someone break that down for me. A true 160 pounder who was destroying legitimate opposition or Brook.. Who got past Porter then went back to regional level and waited for a payday.

As for GGG vs wilder, GGG has consistently fought the best available opponents. Wilder has every HW chomping at the bit to fight him and deliberately opted for local toughman tournament opponents.

[GMAN SUPREME]

golovkin has the best win.