Golovkin's best win vs. Wilder's best win

[Earl-Hickey]

Wilder has fought tough warriors like areolla and molina

He's fought slick Americans like Malik Scott

GGG only fights brit hype jobs and eurobums

It's clear who is better

[TheCell8]

Of course the Brook win is more impressive, he's the far superior fighter. Stiverne isn't even better than David Lemieux.

[M Bison]

Lemieux is his best win and he is probably a higher standard than Stiverne I like both personally GGG and Wilder this ****ty on people resume stuff needs to stop you can only fight what is put out for you It'd be different If he legitimately did duck someone which he nor Wilder has ever really done well I don't think Wilder has.

Wilder would have fought Povetkin
GGG would have fought Martinez, Sturm, Canelo, Cotto, Jacobs, Quillin and Eubank Jr but there always seems to be some sort of excuse
GGG resume at 160 shouldn't be demeaned because of others being cowards and Kell was bigger than GGG on the night all that Kell displayed was that when he didn't have his weight advantage he wasn't so "special".

[boliodogs]

Just to inject a dose of truth into this convo; The majority of people here picked Stiverne to win and Deontay was only a slight favorite in the betting odds. Almost no one picked Brook. Let's not pretend Brook is suddenly the better win. That's a lie of convenience.

The reason GGG was heavily favored to beat Brook while Wilder was only a slight favorite against Stiverne is because everybody knew GGG was a vastly superior fighter than Wilder. It's just that simple. No lie. Just fact.

[SilverMiles]

How are guys like Geale better than Malik Scott and Johann Duhaupas? Their wins are very much comparable.

But that's not the subject of this thread. The subject is who of them that got the one best defining win.

Daniel Geale was unified Champion at Middleweight, don't show everyone your true ignorance by comparing him to Malik Scott and the Frenchmen.

[Sledgeweather17]

Bermane Stiverne and Kell Brook are their best wins. There can be no doubt that Brook is a better fighter than Stiverne, but it can't be ignored that Brook was moving up 2 weight classes, which makes the wins comparable. So which win do you regard higher? Brook moving up 2 weight classes or Stivene?

EDIT: The subject here is NOT who got the better resume, so STFU about that. The subject is: Who of them got the one better defining win?

The better win was obviously Wilder's win over stirvirne. I mean, imagine Wilder fighting Kovalev or Stevenson, what do you think would happen to those poor guys.

[Redd Foxx]

The reason GGG was heavily favored to beat Brook while Wilder was only a slight favorite against Stiverne is because everybody knew GGG was a vastly superior fighter than Wilder. It's just that simple. No lie. Just fact.

That has nothing to do with the topic. TS asks a very basic question and we have 2 pages of people who act like they can't read. It's downright childish that people are so insecure as fans that they can't answer the question without adding all sort of fanboy shyt.

[Raonic]

Brook > Stiverne.

[boliodogs]

Just to inject a dose of truth into this convo; The majority of people here picked Stiverne to win and Deontay was only a slight favorite in the betting odds. Almost no one picked Brook. Let's not pretend Brook is suddenly the better win. That's a lie of convenience.

Lemieux is his best win and he is probably a higher standard than Stiverne I like both personally GGG and Wilder this ****ty on people resume stuff needs to stop you can only fight what is put out for you It'd be different If he legitimately did duck someone which he nor Wilder has ever really done well I don't think Wilder has.

Wilder would have fought Povetkin
GGG would have fought Martinez, Sturm, Canelo, Cotto, Jacobs, Quillin and Eubank Jr but there always seems to be some sort of excuse
GGG resume at 160 shouldn't be demeaned because of others being cowards and Kell was bigger than GGG on the night all that Kell displayed was that when he didn't have his weight advantage he wasn't so "special".

This is exactly right. GGG has always been willing to fight the very best middleweights but they don't want to fight him. Wilder was there, ready to fight high ranked Povetkin and he deserves full credit for that.It sure wasn't his fault the fight didn't happen. Often when posters set out to trash a fighter's resume they aren't the least bit fair about it and leave out important facts and details.

[Kigali]

This is a no brainer, Golovkins fight with Murray, Lemeiux is greater than anyone on Wilders besides Stiverne.. GGG has fought sub par opponents and Wilders are below sub par..

GGG has 4 years on Wilder

Give him time.

He could have had Povetkin on his list but the Russian was dirty.