Brook led 39-37, 38-38, 38-38 how do you justify this?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyBoxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 7454
    • 488
    • 62
    • 50,228

    #71
    Originally posted by !WAR BOXING!
    YDKSAB you emotional lil **** lmfao.



    GGG Turned Down Catchweight Against Canelo at 158.
    Source
    http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...-not-ounce-160

    GGG Was happy to fight Rosado at a catchweight at 158
    source
    Gabriel Rosado says he never asked for a catchweight to face middleweight titlist Gennady Golovkin, and has officially rejected a maximum weight of 158 pounds to fight at the full 160-pound weight limit.


    Now I ask You

    WHY IS GGG OKAY FIGHTING ROSADO AT A CATCHWEIGHT BUT NOT CANELO?

    1 Word

    SHOOK!

    I don't see where there is a source here proving ****nelo agreed to 158.

    I heard them all about 155.


    GBP admitted themselves the duck "later...in 2017"
    SO pretending GGG is the one who ducked Nelo is living in a parallel world or being a piece of trash (you fit the second option)

    Comment

    • BillyBoxing
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 7454
      • 488
      • 62
      • 50,228

      #72
      Originally posted by LacedUp
      Dirrell actually beat GGG in the amateurs. They fought twice. Was robbed in the olympics I think

      I think GGG won in the olympics.

      Then Direll won 15-14 in the US, PROBABLY was a hometown deicision.

      Comment

      • Johnny2x2x
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2013
        • 2288
        • 276
        • 44
        • 18,765

        #73
        I had is 2-2. Doesn't mater though, GGG figured out that Brook couldn't hurt him and just walked him down in round 5.

        Comment

        • -Hyperion-
          The Best And Fastest Ride
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2006
          • 14176
          • 912
          • 1,378
          • 35,380

          #74
          2-2 could be fair tbh. 3-1 was a blind man who couldn't see GGG's jab landing at will after the first 2 rounds

          Comment

          • elfag
            Alpha fäggot
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 15588
            • 3,478
            • 302
            • 65,929

            #75
            I thought Brook won the 2nd clearly. I had it 1-3, but some of the others were close so 2-2 isnt a big deal. 3-1 for brook is a joke.

            It doesnt really matter much though, lets say they didnt stop it in the 5th, which GGG would have taken, Brook stopped throwing back for large portions of the 5th round, which is why the trainer stopped it, it was only a matter of time. He couldnt last another 2-3 rounds, much less until the 12th.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP