Brook led 39-37, 38-38, 38-38 how do you justify this?

[Robbie Barrett]

I suggest many of you go watch the Sky version of the fight it has closer camera angles and shows many of the punches compubox and some of you think land fall short. Golovkin lands about 10 punches in round 1 but compubox says he landed 30.

[Jim Tom]

I watched the Sky Version and nowhere did Kell win a single round including the second round. Yes he landed a few shots but GGG was in total control of the fight. The scoring was nothing but a premeditated robbery and had for any reason Kell survived the 12 rounds he would have been given the victory by a wide margin.

[Sun_Tzu]

I had it even into the 5th on the 1st watch. 3-1 Golovkin on the second watch. I think Brook got alot of credit for not getting blasted out immediately and maybe that swayed some judging, me included. I have no problem with the 2-2 scores but Brooks was definitely not winning the fight going into the 5th.

[bboy80]

It matters because if the fight went the distance GGG would've been robbed.

Lol get out of here you idiot.

[MDPopescu]

No way should Brook have been winning. the draw cards are just about ok if you are very generous to Brook.

I had it 3-1 GGG

Once I saw that GGG gave up his stiff jab after the 1st round I didn't bother scoring anymore.

[nacho daddy]

Can ggg fight a lw?

no but hagler did

[nacho daddy]

Yeah I remember that. His skin was sliding off of his face, but he was winning doe.

gee that is funny lewis turned down millions for a rematch. if Klit so easy to beat why turn down an easy payday?

[Jim Tom]

Lewis was only offered $5m for a rematch and that was way below his usual purses.

[BuckToothed]

When getting stopped in 5 and throwing in the towel means you were winning gone bad...

[LacedUp]

2-2 was fair I think. You could make a case for 3-1 either way.