Tweet
How on earth could Brook had been leading? Is this the biggest screw job ever?
-
-
nobody is leading if 2 cards have it even. /thread. -
UK scoring plus LacedUp was one of the kunt judges.Comment
-
Bumlovkin was getting outboxed and downright EMBARRASSED by a WELTERWEIGHT. This is why Team Triple Duck dodged Lara and Ward. They only want to knock over TOMATO CANs and WELTEWEIGHTs...Comment
-
There were some close rounds, Brook had plenty of success.
2-2 probably fair.Comment
-
UK is biased as f.uck
A fighter knows that when they go there they have to compete against the judges,refs & the fighter
It probably prevents a lot of American fighters from going there because of it
Like that Kd in the third that wasn't credited was kind of suspect also, if Brook went the distance best believe they would have found a way for him to get the decision or make it as close as possible
I bet even Canelo thinks the UK judges are biasedComment
-
Why is the end of 4 rds so important to so many?
The fight was over in 5 by tko and one more rd. would have been KO so whats the big deal.
Kell is a good boxer and he held distance for a little while until GGG found his distance. If Golovkin used his double jab to track Kell down at the beginning the fight would have been over in three! GGG is a stubborn fellow and he let his frustration dictate his approach which was very amateurish and dangerous!
Most good solid punchers are hard headed people!
RayComment
-
I'm fine with those.
2-2 is what the fight should be scored. One of the judges gave Brook an extra round. While I don't agree with it, I can understand it. Like Golovkin said, he was making a street fight, and Brook was boxing better overall.Comment
-
There were some toss-up rounds in there where both did good work. Not surprised.Comment
-
i gave brook the 2nd and 4th........
i gave golovkin the 1st & 3rd. draw leading into the 5th. how is this card such a outrage to people? LOL
the fight was very close going into the 5th wtf.Comment
Comment