Comments Thread For: Cuadras: I Felt That I Did Enough To Beat Chocolatito

[HeroBando]

I shouldn't have watched this fight. I was already pissed at these GGG fans suddenly not wanting the Jacobs fight. Now I'm pissed at this robbery. I wanna say 8-4 but i can clearly see 7-5 Cuadras. A draw would be generous to Gonzalez. Gonzalez aggression was ineffective. If his aggression was effective why was Cuadras still able to move as well in the 12th as he did in the 1st? I saw a lot of coming forward swinging and missing from Gonzalez and Cuadras would catch him with two or three punches and back out and reset while Gonzalez is left swinging and missing. Gonzalez is missing so bad he's spinning himself around. I also see Gonzalez being swayed from side to side by shots that's hitting his gloves. He caught Cuadras with some good shots square but they didn't have an effect because Cuadras was still throwing and moving. He didn't slow Cuadras down the whole fight. That's why his aggression shouldn't count as effective aggression. They may look like big shots but they aren't having as much an impact as they seem. He dominated the latter half of the fight. Lederman's scorecard was atrocious. I hear Max and Roy say Gonzalez lands a great body shot but Cuadras doesn't stop moving. I see Cuadras land a body shot and Gonzalez clams up.

It's not Ggg fans that are asking for ridiculous money, that's Jacobs. That's who you should be pissed at, disingenuous coward

[-Kev-]

Didn't watch the fight but judging by everyone saying it was close Cuadras should've won. Whatever happened to you gotta take the belt from the champion?

RG was the betting fave and the network fave (very important advantage) so they weren't going to give it to Cuadras if it was close, despite you being right that he is the champ and as the challenger you can't just fight as good as the champ, you have to fight better or else the champ gets the close nod. In this case RG was treated as the champ in the socrecards and it was Cuadras who had to fight better, not on par, with RG. Unfortunately for Cuadras. Politics is who gets what, when, where, why and how and politics were just not in his favor in this close fight

[John Locke]

Nah, no way did he win, but it was a close and competitive fight. 8-4 or 7-5 Choco,

Cuadras can fight though, he's got great legs, explosive speed and combination punching.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Ricardo Mayorga: "I am nica but with the hand in my heart, I need to say it: Cuadras was robbed"

For the people that know spanish:

[Motorcity Cobra]

RG was the betting fave and the network fave (very important advantage) so they weren't going to give it to Cuadras if it was close, despite you being right that he is the champ and as the challenger you can't just fight as good as the champ, you have to fight better or else the champ gets the close nod. In this case RG was treated as the champ in the socrecards and it was Cuadras who had to fight better, not on par, with RG. Unfortunately for Cuadras. Politics is who gets what, when, where, why and how and politics were just not in his favor in this close fight

I watched it:

I shouldn't have watched this fight. I was already pissed at these GGG fans suddenly not wanting the Jacobs fight. Now I'm pissed at this robbery. I wanna say 8-4 but i can clearly see 7-5 Cuadras. A draw would be generous to Gonzalez. Gonzalez aggression was ineffective. If his aggression was effective why was Cuadras still able to move as well in the 12th as he did in the 1st? I saw a lot of coming forward swinging and missing from Gonzalez and Cuadras would catch him with two or three punches and back out and reset while Gonzalez is left swinging and missing. Gonzalez is missing so bad he's spinning himself around. I also see Gonzalez being swayed from side to side by shots that's hitting his gloves. He caught Cuadras with some good shots square but they didn't have an effect because Cuadras was still throwing and moving. He didn't slow Cuadras down the whole fight. That's why his aggression shouldn't count as effective aggression. They may look like big shots but they aren't having as much an impact as they seem. He dominated the latter half of the fight. Lederman's scorecard was atrocious. I hear Max and Roy say Gonzalez lands a great body shot but Cuadras doesn't stop moving. I see Cuadras land a body shot and Gonzalez clams up.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Yea, he did have a "slick" style, maybe that's why I was more impressed with him. But my other point still remains. If anyone is scoring the bout for Gonzalez based off effective aggression you have to show me how his aggression was effective. Cuadras was still moving in the 12th like he was in the 1st. He didn't wear Cuadras down and Cuadras had Gonzalez spent by the 11th rd. He put on a masterclass performance imo.

I agree... And about this... the face of Cuadras told us that this was a ****in bull****. The effective guy was Cuadras, but well, he is not the kid promoted for HBO.

Round 1 was for Cuadras, in my opinion.

Round 1 maybe, but he was busting him up for real after the 4th. Ledderman talking about running was probably because these guys were going at it like a DVD stuck on fast forward. Great fight![/QUOTE]

Nope, man, that was because Roman is of HBO, the guy of the media power.

[lumiere]

La ganaste campeón. Chocoputito no las pela!

Roman: pue, gane la pelea claramente... Pue...

que lindas las fotos del hijo del chocolatito que tienes en tu avi y sig

[lumiere]

I hope this doesn't turn into some ridiculous controversy. The right guy won. This is just like the people who say Estrada was robbed (seems like the exact same people).

yeah theyre called mexicans lol


lets not even get started on marquez vs pac . every mexican boxer that loses thinks he got robbed

[-Kev-]

RG is lucky Cuadras "ran", his face looks unrecognizable against that runner

[Boxfan83]

I shouldn't have watched this fight. I was already pissed at these GGG fans suddenly not wanting the Jacobs fight. Now I'm pissed at this robbery. I wanna say 8-4 but i can clearly see 7-5 Cuadras. A draw would be generous to Gonzalez. Gonzalez aggression was ineffective. If his aggression was effective why was Cuadras still able to move as well in the 12th as he did in the 1st? I saw a lot of coming forward swinging and missing from Gonzalez and Cuadras would catch him with two or three punches and back out and reset while Gonzalez is left swinging and missing. Gonzalez is missing so bad he's spinning himself around. I also see Gonzalez being swayed from side to side by shots that's hitting his gloves. He caught Cuadras with some good shots square but they didn't have an effect because Cuadras was still throwing and moving. He didn't slow Cuadras down the whole fight. That's why his aggression shouldn't count as effective aggression. They may look like big shots but they aren't having as much an impact as they seem. He dominated the latter half of the fight. Lederman's scorecard was atrocious. I hear Max and Roy say Gonzalez lands a great body shot but Cuadras doesn't stop moving. I see Cuadras land a body shot and Gonzalez clams up.

Lol yeah man all the telling harder shots were from cuadras especially to the body. I admit he shouldve stayed more consistent to the body but the head was easy to find. Gonzalez missed ALOT, missing and the body shots slowed him down. I understand biasness but Lederman was on another planet. I think if roy jones and kellerman werent underpressure by hbo they wouldve called that fight the other way. Its no surprise they had BHop call the ggg fight, he wouldve gave his legit 2 cents.

& lol man i didnt even want to touch those ggg threads. After i seen the fight i knew it was gonna be 1 of those 1000 reply threads.