Golovkin got no skills

[Fangedgrowl]

Honestly, it would be best for Golovkin to retire now before he gets seriously clowned by a guy like Ward.

Why don't you retire from this forum before you get clowned by people who know and don't show ****** biases!

[BattlingNelson]

Brook is a good fighter, but he's not that special and he came from a lower weight class, so yes, it was absolutely embarassing for Golovkin to not be able to destroy him in 2 rounds.

A good fighter? How can a 'good fighter' lose to a 'clueless' guy with 'no skill', 'no defense' and who throws 'wild punches' and is unable to adjust? Sure ly a good fighter does not lose to a guy like that? A guy who can only cut off the ring.

Wow.

[Fangedgrowl]

Golovkin can't even dream of achieving a resume like Froch's resume. It's the white people who are making all this **** up. They want a white king of boxing and when the white fighters fall, such as Froch and Kessler, then they start hyping guys like Kovalev and Golovkin. When Ward has schooled Kovalev, the white people will start rating Golovkin as the P4P#1 and when Golovkin finally loses too, they will find some new white guy and say "this guy is soo different, much better than Froch, Kovalev, Kessler and Golovkin!!", LOL, it's hilarioius.

Same thing you are doing dumba** . If A fighter isn't black he gets no credit form you scrub. Give me a break. You boxing knowledge sucks clown and quit being a hater .

[1g5a22]

Dude, are you that blinded by your fanboyism? Just watch round 1, when Golovkin got jelly legs, and if you're too ******ed to see it, then show me how to make a gif out of it.

Tell you what post me round number 1 & I'll have another look? Badly hurt hahahahahaha

[1g5a22]

Golovkin can't even dream of achieving a resume like Froch's resume. It's the white people who are making all this **** up. They want a white king of boxing and when the white fighters fall, such as Froch and Kessler, then they start hyping guys like Kovalev and Golovkin. When Ward has schooled Kovalev, the white people will start rating Golovkin as the P4P#1 and when Golovkin finally loses too, they will find some new white guy and say "this guy is soo different, much better than Froch, Kovalev, Kessler and Golovkin!!", LOL, it's hilarioius.

Why are you playing a race card?

Who on earth ever suggested either Froch or Kessler were ever going to be the white kings of boxing in the first place? Calzaghe, Klitschko, Kovalev & Golovkin are simply better boxers.. Froch & Kessler as good as they are were never the poster boys for such a ridiculous cause/claim anyway. I put it to you that you are the one hurting & racially butt hurt here. Wards dad was white anyway so any claim you have to him can be countered equally the other way. Not that anyone really cares about Ward. Someones upset at all the EE/European champions right now hahahahahah

[mick1303]

Absolutely, only a boxing fück wit would suggest so or TheBoxingFückwit. GGG is a top talent, one of the most complete boxer punchers we've seen, whilst I enjoy his style he could have won that fight easier and earlier had he picked his shots better he was loading up on EVERYTHING, he wasnt wrong about putting on a show but it kind of detracted from his performance from a boxing purists point of view I suppose.

The shots he shipped he would never had taken if he perceived Brook as a threat. I've followed GGG longer than most, lost a little interest along the way but watching his interviews after the fight I attached myself to the wagon again. I still want to see him clear out 168 rather than stick around 160, he should avoid a CW or 175 for Ward though.

You are convinced that he did it on purpose to lure the opponents. Fine. Keep it to yourself! How are they suppose to be lured if message boards are full of wistleblowers? Let the man make his buck! It is good that we have such dedicated and knowledgable "boxing experts" here. They will tell the truth and hopefully Sanders, Jacobs and Eubank will read it

[LacedUp]

... Yes, sure... Under this lecture key, team's GGG answer to Ward calling him out for a 50-50 fight also was a tongue in cheek -- "you want 50-50 right now, then come at 164... if not -- then go and fight some good names and came back to us"... right?

Froch said GGG could come to 170/172 and they said no.

[NYC8224]

I asked BoxingXpert a question and he responded like a scumbag. He knows nothing about boxing

[NYC8224]

You are convinced that he did it on purpose to lure the opponents. Fine. Keep it to yourself! How are they suppose to be lured if message boards are full of wistleblowers? Let the man make his buck! It is good that we have such dedicated and knowledgable "boxing experts" here. They will tell the truth and hopefully Sanders, Jacobs and Eubank will read it

I love it. Everybody on this message board knows more than boxers themselves and eveybody here knows how to beat GGG, yet nobody has come close and probably never will. Don't you love keyboard trainers? Bunch of losers

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

GGG is no bum, but hes a flawed fighter, this backlash is to his fanatics who act like hes already an ATG and making every excuse in the book, even saying he gets hit on purpose smh. his offense is great but his defense isn't up to par. Hes a better technical boxer than he showed vs kell, but footwork and distance is the key to beating him, also fighting him on the inside n making him go backwards, u see he gets uncomfortable. don't think for one minute he isn't a pretty good boxer when he wants to be. But if Jacobs lands that uppercut brook landed (which isn't hard to land) It can be lights out. hopefully that fight is made next...

u fanatics don't give any other fighters slack including ATGs when they have hard fights, so deal with it, professional boxers are saying he got exposed, they saw something its not just people hating, its just true.