Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brook. Khan. Who Is The Greater Fighter?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
    Brook is my answer here in this thread, but you know I can't let you slide with calling Porter a better win than Maidana right?

    At the time of the Porter fight, Maidana was a bigger name and is/was a better fighter.

    At the time of the Maidana/Khan fight, sure, I'll give you that Porter was a better fighter then, pre-Garcia maidana is not the same as post-garcia maidana. But p4p prime for prime Maidana destroys Porter. If Maidana was at WW right now not a soul would beat him, the only Reason Bradley and Brook are in that 1-2 spot are because he retired. And you know I think really highly of Brook so don't think I am taking anything from him, just keeping it real here.

    Also, it's hard to call Maidana a "best win" for Khan because if that fight goes one more round Khan loses that fight lol. He was surviving, and Khan tards like to act like he gave Marcos a beating. After he dropped him with a body shot he did nothing but try and survive. I do have a rematch thread and I will bump it if I need to to show that the majority of NSB had Maidana bodying him.
    When Brook fought Porter, Porter was a top 5 WW with a belt and an undefeated record coming off two destructive wins and was a big favourite to win against Brook. People were saying he was a mini mike tyson and Mayweather would avoid him (no, really).

    When Khan fought Maidana, Maidana was a good boogeyman top 5 LWW. However, he had just been shown up by the likes of old Erik Morales and Chop chop corley. Khan still nearly died in there.

    Yes, Maidana became a lot better 2-3 years down the line and possibly was a better welterweight than Porter - Not something he ever proved in the ring though, since his best WW win outside of Broner who's not a welterweight, is like Soto Karass or something.

    But Khan didn't fight 2013 Maidana. He fought 2010 Maidana, so why would I say he did better than Brook?

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by AliBombaye View Post
      I bet you think his resume is better than Khan's right now don't you, sore little scrub you are, riding on the ball sacks of a 1 notable win fighter in 10 ****ING YEARS, what a joke just like his thinner than a hair follicle resume.

      Let's hope the next time Brook makes ****esexual advances to a lone man in his apartment in the early hours of the morning the guy finishes the job and hopefully you can follow Kelly to his grave.
      No I don't really. But he's a better fighter for sure. He just went neck and neck with GGG - A guy who everyone predicted would destroy him with no problem. Unlike Khan, Brook wasn't sleeping

      Guys like Khan are the reason Brook's resume isn't better. Because they are scared to death of fighting him.

      But for the record, Khan's resume of featherfisted LWWs isn't impressive.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
        Right. Brook maybe took a GGG payday too soon. Khan has had better reputation as a fighter, he has had wins over Barrera, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Alexander, Algieri, Collazo and he could have afforded Canelo fight. But brook has had a very thin resume, he should have built his resume at 147 against some good guys instead of hopless fight against 160 champ..Now it will be much more difficult, GGG seriuosly hurt him..
        [IMG]http://i6.***********.com/albums/y232/LLSamSam/Gif%20Folder/tumblr_lr6bddNEmn1qhp9er.gif[/IMG]

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
          No I don't really. But he's a better fighter for sure. He just went neck and neck with GGG - A guy who everyone predicted would destroy him with no problem. Unlike Khan, Brook wasn't sleeping

          Guys like Khan are the reason Brook's resume isn't better. Because they are scared to death of fighting him.

          But for the record, Khan's resume of featherfisted LWWs isn't impressive.
          Brook destroys Khan. Retires him.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            I think we got confirmed today what we always knew. Brook would absolutely smash Khan, and that's why the fight hasn't happened.

            Brook just went toe to toe with GGG ffs. Just rewatched the fight and it was even until the 5th round. Golovkin missing and getting frustrated but of course landing some deadly shots. Brook had some fine clean work in there stunning Golovkin and backing him up at times.

            It's not even a question in my mind.


            Remember when Khan fans used to brag about his 4 rounds of success vs Garcia

            Comment


            • #96
              Brook's career stands at 37 fights, includes inching a decision vs the only legit WW he fought & going 5 rounds with GGG at MW. You can include making a name off of Khan if you wish.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                Remember when Khan fans used to brag about his 4 rounds of success vs Garcia
                You mean the two rounds against a guy he was a massive favourite to win against before getting cleaned out?

                Right, that's the same as fighting GGG

                Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                Brook's career stands at 37 fights, includes inching a decision vs the only legit WW he fought & going 5 rounds with GGG at MW. You can include making a name off of Khan if you wish.
                Maybe that would be different if Khan had a set of balls.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                  When Brook fought Porter, Porter was a top 5 WW with a belt and an undefeated record coming off two destructive wins and was a big favourite to win against Brook. People were saying he was a mini mike tyson and Mayweather would avoid him (no, really).

                  When Khan fought Maidana, Maidana was a good boogeyman top 5 LWW. However, he had just been shown up by the likes of old Erik Morales and Chop chop corley. Khan still nearly died in there.

                  Yes, Maidana became a lot better 2-3 years down the line and possibly was a better welterweight than Porter - Not something he ever proved in the ring though, since his best WW win outside of Broner who's not a welterweight, is like Soto Karass or something.

                  But Khan didn't fight 2013 Maidana. He fought 2010 Maidana, so why would I say he did better than Brook?
                  Mini Mike Tyson, Never heard that until HEARN said that a couple days ago trying to hype this fight. Kind of sad that you felt the need to parrot this statement

                  I've always said Khan got the decision against Marcos but didn't win that fight, but at least Amir went balls to wall after yesterday you can't say Brook would do the same because he showed he wouldn't

                  Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                  No I don't really. But he's a better fighter for sure. He just went neck and neck with GGG - A guy who everyone predicted would destroy him with no problem. Unlike Khan, Brook wasn't sleeping

                  Guys like Khan are the reason Brook's resume isn't better. Because they are scared to death of fighting him.

                  But for the record, Khan's resume of featherfisted LWWs isn't impressive.
                  Really neck and neck, Brook got blasted out in 4 1/2 rounds. The only reason it was even competitive for a couple rounds was because Gennady didn't respect anything Kell brought to the table because he knew he'd break him and guess what he did exactly that in under 5 rounds.

                  Brooks had opportunities to make his dogshi.t resume better but for the last 2 1/2 years anytime a live body was even brought up Brook and his team found a way to avoid those fights . Sh.it even Chaves got the cold shoulder. Great fighter though

                  You sound ****** , Stop embarrassing yourself

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by R_Walken View Post
                    Mini Mike Tyson, Never heard that until HEARN said that a couple days ago trying to hype this fight. Kind of sad that you felt the need to parrot this statement

                    I've always said Khan got the decision against Marcos but didn't win that fight, but at least Amir went balls to wall after yesterday you can't say Brook would do the same because he showed he wouldn't

                    Really neck and neck, Brook got blasted out in 4 1/2 rounds. The only reason it was even competitive for a couple rounds was because Gennady didn't respect anything Kell brought to the table because he knew he'd break him and guess what he did exactly that in under 5 rounds.

                    Brooks had opportunities to make his dogshi.t resume better but for the last 2 1/2 years anytime a live body was even brought up Brook and his team found a way to avoid those fights . Sh.it even Chaves got the cold shoulder. Great fighter though

                    You sound ****** , Stop embarrassing yourself
                    Yeah well I guess you haven't followed boxing since Brook fought Porter then Because that was a daily description here.

                    There's no neck and neck at all. Brook went up 2 weight classes, Khan 1 + 1lb. Khan ended up sleeping, Brook didn't get knocked down. And that was against a far better fighter.

                    Yeah GGG chose to get hit right?

                    And you say I sound ******. haha

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
                      i'd say brook. However not with confidence. And why are people using last nights fight to mean that brook would beat khan? Khan basically won every round against canelo until his glassjaw cost him again. Brook got beaten up, wobbled in first round, eye socket broke and then pulled out in the 5th.
                      This is how much of a casual fan you are. You're actually judging who is the greater fighter on their last fights. First you say Brook, I assume to make your love interest's (g string) record look better (not the 1st time you've attempted that) then make a case for Khan.

                      For the record, the correct answer is Khan. He has simply accomplished more is his career. With that said, H2H I'd pick Brook. I just don't think Khan's chin can last vs a world class puncher.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP