Brook. Khan. Who Is The Greater Fighter?

[Szef]

It's still Amir Khan.

[Earl-Hickey]

A mere con
And I'm getting knocked out

A mere con
And I'm losing the fight

A mere con

[HanzGruber]

I think we got confirmed today what we always knew. Brook would absolutely smash Khan, and that's why the fight hasn't happened.

Brook just went toe to toe with GGG ffs. Just rewatched the fight and it was even until the 5th round. Golovkin missing and getting frustrated but of course landing some deadly shots. Brook had some fine clean work in there stunning Golovkin and backing him up at times.

It's not even a question in my mind.

And khan was best in canelo lol. So what? it doesn't confirm anything except one guy is bigger than the other

Khan has a better resume to answer the op

[Beercules]

I think Brook

[LacedUp]

Were you watching a Brook highlight reel?

As for the topic - Brook, by far. The guy has one hell of a chin and is a well rounded, world level fighter.

It was pretty even. Brook took over midway through the first, the second round was his and half of 3rd + big parts of 4.

Of course GGG had his moments too. Brook was up on the scorecards btw.

[LacedUp]

And khan was best in canelo lol. So what? it doesn't confirm anything except one guy is bigger than the other

Khan has a better resume to answer the op

Khan has been knocked down and out at all levels. Canelo is no GGG.

It confirms Brook is better than Khan.

Oh god, this resume bs is absolutely embarrassing.
Brook just held his own vs GGG ffs. Stood in the middle of the ring with him. Khan slept on the floor vs a much lesser fighter in Canelo.

[LacedUp]

It's still Amir Khan.

You don't honestly think that. Absolutely idiotic.

[Szef]

You don't honestly think that. Absolutely idiotic.

Greater means more accomplished and with better resume. And Khan has those things over Brook. If you think otherwise that's on you. But you'd be wrong.

If he asked who's a better fighter my answer would be different.

[LacedUp]

Greater means more accomplished and with better resume. And Khan has those things over Brook. If you think otherwise that's on you. But you'd be wrong.

If he asked who's a better fighter my answer would be different.

Beating Shawn Porter alone is better than anything Khan has done in his career. That is the sad truth.

Brook is better by miles, that's the first thing. Greater is subject especially as none of them are great or have done anything in their careers to be considered great.

[mani1]

Beating Shawn Porter alone is better than anything Khan has done in his career. That is the sad truth.

Brook is better by miles, that's the first thing. Greater is subject especially as none of them are great or have done anything in their careers to be considered great.

Hahahahhaha the guy who needed the judges help to beat as Hearn put it "A shot blown up feather fisted lightweight"

Who's best win is considered a cherry pick for Khan or do you consider Broner his best win a guy whom barely beat a shot to **** Paulie if that, a man whom Khan stopped years earlier and many here were saying was faded then