Overrating and underrating

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ukbox
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 1455
    • 101
    • 395
    • 8,786

    #21
    As a boxing expert...

    What weaknesses do you see in loma & ggg.
    I think it would be great to read the observations of an expert.
    Perhaps your observations could inspire confidence in the professional fighters that rate & duck both fighters

    Comment

    • boliodogs
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 33358
      • 824
      • 1,782
      • 309,589

      #22
      Originally posted by TheBoxingXpert
      So you think I have some preference for English boxers? Last time I checked, Walters and Ward weren't English.

      So you think i have some preference for black boxers? Last time I checked, Froch and Fury weren't black.

      Your theory contradicts itself.
      You really are a ****** SOB. I said your are were bias in favor of BOTH black boxers and English boxers and you clearly are. You are pro Froch and Fury because they are English. You are pro Walters and Ward because they are black. Do you understand that? You probably still don't get it because you are really an incredibly ****** MFer. It's not a theory that you are bias in favor of English boxers and black boxers. It's a fact that you prove daily by the contents of your posts.

      Comment

      • TheBoxingXpert
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2016
        • 1544
        • 101
        • 0
        • 8,170

        #23
        Originally posted by boliodogs
        You really are a ****** SOB. I said your are were bias in favor of BOTH black boxers and English boxers and you clearly are. You are pro Froch and Fury because they are English. You are pro Walters and Ward because they are black. Do you understand that? You probably still don't get it because you are really an incredibly ****** MFer. It's not a theory that you are bias in favor of English boxers and black boxers. It's a fact that you prove daily by the contents of your posts.
        Bro. The best boxers in the world today tends to be black and/or British. Show me a proven fighter with a good resume from any country and it will have my interest. The guys I like don't get a pass for just being black or british. They have proven themselves. That's something Golovkin and Lomachenko still haven't done. I can't accept their greatness before they prove it.

        I used to be a big fan of Kessler, who is not British, and Arthur Abraham, who is not british. And neither of them are black. I also really liked Pacquiao's fights.

        And I think Golovkin and Lomachenko could be good fighters, but they need to start proving it. For some reasons, british fighters and black fighters just seem more willing to prove themselves.

        Lomachenko refused to fight Walters, so he blew his chance. Golovkin refused to fight Ward, so he blev his chance. I don't give a **** about them not being British or Black. I just rate fighters based on their achievements, not based on losing to Salido or looking good when beating bums in Deontay Wilder style.

        Kovalev is a guy that Golovkin and Lomachenko could learn a lot from. Kovalev tried to fight Stevenson and he now got the balls to fight Ward, which is something Golovkin would never have the guts to do.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP