Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao: I Still Believe I Beat Floyd Mayweather!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by boxinggod101 View Post
    Lol ok.... I knew a " fake" boxing expert would come act like hes some kind of professional analyst. Floyd won clearly. Manny isnt the same since the Marquez KO and has drop the number of punches he throws way before Floyd. It qas a boring chessmatch and the better mord gifted fighter won.
    And I knew a dumb kid would dismiss what he knows nothing about , ever heard of the saying " Throwing pearls before swine " ?

    Comment


    • #62
      I can hear my name from up above Mt Olympus! I see the loyal servants who licks floyd's sole are all here waiting for my return. I've been a busy man lately, but seeing that I've been mentioned over and over in my absence, It is only proper I come and visit from time to time. Much that I was expecting a red carpet as I come in here. Mentioning me is enough to show your appreciation in my expose' has reached you fl0mos far and wide.

      I am flattered! To that I say,

      I'M BACK!!!

      Now to translate what Pac has just said in this awesome thread.

      Comment


      • #63
        remember pacs team said pac was afraid of needles so no drug test back during 2009-2010 and then de la hoya was like "he is ****ing tattooed"

        the pac-tards. rofl

        Comment


        • #64
          So I see, Pac mentions what most have already known except for the die hard floyd fan boys here..Which are obviously present and first in to come in here AS ALWAYS.

          As I quote Pac,"'I threw a lot of punches than him and I thought I did more than he did."

          YES YOU DID MY FRIEND. YES YOU DID!

          NOT ONLY DID YOU THREW MORE. YOU CONNECTED MORE THAN HE EVER DID WITH JUST ONE HEALTHY ARM AT THAT.

          LEGENDARY


          Last edited by Spoon23; 09-08-2016, 09:10 PM.

          Comment


          • #65
            Now now.. To dissect Pac's thoughts..

            Defense, What is it all about?

            Do you have great defense if you got hit more?

            Nope!

            Ring Generalship, do you have great ring generalship if the whole time you are running around away from the center of the ring?

            Nope!

            Did Floyd win in his home town Vegas? Yes

            Did Floyd deserve the win for that controversial fight when evidence points out who truly connected more per round that night was actually not floyd the running hugging ***** boxer, but the guy from ASIA.. Does Floyd deserve that win for that poor showing?

            Answer: A RESOUNDING

            NOPE!

            You truly are the true winner that night PAC. You can raise your head high for what Floyd got that night was an empty win.





            Punching to connect is the name of the game in boxing. I have shown proof Pac connected the more clean and effective punching that night, not to mention the more punches per rounds in this fight.

            That said. To have effective aggression, you have to hit your opponent with clean effective punching, more so than your opponent per round. - Pac did

            Ring generalship- ring generalship is he who controls the center of the ring and controls his opponent to place him were he wants him to be and while doing that landing the more effective blows than his opponent. - Pac again did that. He commanded the center of the ring pushed Floyd back whenever he wants to over and over to the ropes for 12 rounds while doing so also landed the cleaner more effective punches.

            Defense- defense is to not get hit, so who did get hit more throughout the fight? As I have proven in this thread Floyd got hit more per round. Shows who's defense had more holes.

            Clean and effective punching: It means those punches landed with intent and the gravity of the punches is how you measure it's significance per round.

            Even if you have aggression if you can't hit your opponent effectively your aggression is not an effective aggression.

            Even if you have ring generalship, but you can't land effectively on your opponent then your ring generalship ain't that great.

            Defense, if you get hit more than your opponent. Then your defense is weaker than your opponent.

            You cannot have good ring generalship, good defense, effective aggression if you hit less than your opponent.

            Pac did that with flying colors. He Landed the significant punches, landed the cleaner more effective punches and above all landed more punches.

            I've shown proof landed the more significant punches per rounds that were disputed is actually Pac's!
            Last edited by Spoon23; 10-05-2016, 06:49 PM.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by KLockard23 View Post
              lol No. You lost the fight. The 11th round even proved that Mayweather could have probably knocked you out if he wanted to.
              Yeah that's it, lmao. Floyd just didn't "feel like" KO'ing Manny.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by KLockard23 View Post
                lol No. You lost the fight. The 11th round even proved that Mayweather could have probably knocked you out if he wanted to.
                I agree here, I recall the 11th Floyd really coming out aggressively and throwing hard shots for a bit. The reach advantage really showed a lot in that Rd as well.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Mike D View Post
                  Yeah that's it, lmao. Floyd just didn't "feel like" KO'ing Manny.
                  Don't think it was about that so much as it was Floyd not wanting to risk it, when he knew he was already ahead.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post
                    Don't think it was about that so much as it was Floyd not wanting to risk it, when he knew he was already ahead.
                    Naah he was only winning since Vegas was in his pockets from the get go..






                    Give me some Floyd highlights with his fight with pacquiao, then I give you double the highlights of pacquiao.


                    Floyd might've won, but it will always go down as controversial. Which calls for a rematch to settle the beef.

                    The best thing that ever happened to boxing was the retirement of Floyd Maywheather Jr. He gave boxing a bad name. Controversial win and yet he stays retired. Says what truly happened that night was a farce from the truth. If you get a way with a fake win, don't press your luck for a 2nd one.

                    It would be ****** to do a con move twice.


                    Last edited by Spoon23; 09-08-2016, 09:55 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post
                      Don't think it was about that so much as it was Floyd not wanting to risk it, when he knew he was already ahead.
                      Exactly. When you're up late in the fight, why would you take unnecessary risks. You wouldn't. Especially against a guy like Pac.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP