Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBA Prez: Golovkin-Brook Rejected Because It's a Business Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by CaneloMaidana View Post
    Did you you just compare Kell to Duran and Leonard? Both of whom had fought at 154.
    Brook fought at SWW multiple times early in his career and fought at MW once.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by CaneloMaidana View Post
      Did you you just compare Kell to Duran and Leonard? Both of whom had fought at 154.
      Robert Duran that came up from Lightweight to Kell Brook a career Welterweight. I just did.

      Comment


      • #43
        So now this piece of **** organisation wants to take a stand? **** off and go create another belt for more sanctioning fees, you corrupt c*nts.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame View Post
          Duran or Sugar Rays legacy wouldn't exist with this thinking.
          Duran and sugar ray legacy would in fact exist because that was the norm back then as 154 was nonexistent so moving from 147-160 was the next option

          Comment


          • #45
            We all know it's a business fight, however as soon as Canelo vacated the WBC belt, the WBA should have ordered GGG vs. Jacobs! The WBA is part of the problem, i.e. "regular champ," "interim champ," etc.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
              We all know it's a business fight, however as soon as Canelo vacated the WBC belt, the WBA should have ordered GGG vs. Jacobs! The WBA is part of the problem, i.e. "regular champ," "interim champ," etc.
              We all know they part of the problem but doesn't change the fact they did right thing especially considering brook not even a WBA belt holder in division he was a champ at

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                Its 2016. Most fights are business fights. Its just who's business. Like last time out GGG had to fight Wade or risk losing a belt. There is no reason on earth for GGG to have fought Wade unless we got bs ass alphabet rankings saying he needs to cuz certainly fans weren't screaming for that fight to happen or the first 20 fights they'd like to see GGG in.
                Exactly! Why the **** was Wade made a mandatory? How did David Avanesyan become Keith Thurman's mandatory for beating 44-year old Sugar Shane Mosely?

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Can'tHoldMeBack View Post
                  We all know they part of the problem but doesn't change the fact they did right thing especially considering brook not even a WBA belt holder in division he was a champ at
                  They did the right thing here, but they just did the wrong thing again just recently! They made Avanesyan the mandatory for Thurman, because he beat Shane Mosely! WTF???

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    Brook fought at SWW multiple times early in his career and fought at MW once.
                    Duran fought at 154 then Hagler at 157, not 13 pound jump.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame View Post
                      Robert Duran that came up from Lightweight to Kell Brook a career Welterweight. I just did.
                      Hmm, let me get all these amazing Kell wins that make him Duran level.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP