Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[Shape up]

WADA - vada cheap knock off



MCDONALDS - mcdowells cheap knock off




"They have the big mac. We have the big Mick"





https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=PzTiRNY2GGQ

You're a moron. The application for the TUE was uploaded to the ADAMS database when it was accepted. So why the **** are you making up some scenario where WADA would have had to wait years to review it?

Now do you understand, you ****ing ******? You are quite possibly the dumbest poster on this site. I'm dead ass serious about that.

So either you can't read or when I have embarrassed you again you just go into a rant making no sense at all, when you come off the ice read it again and you might actually understand what it means

[Shape up]

By the way vada still has a better strike rate and it is a fact, usada let people like floyd off the hook because they pay so much, clearly he didn't pass the prerequisites for an IV but was still let off with usada helping him get away with it

[travestyny]

I see my point completely flew over your head; yet again. Let me explain in the fewest words possible so as to not confuse your undeveloped brain. Toradol is NOT a PED. So therefore, using it, or attempting to use it would not be considered "cheating" regardless of the situation.

Since you trust the NSAC so blindly, here's a statement directly from their website which clearly states that non-steroidal anti-inflammatories like toradol are... wait for it... NOT PROHIBITED!

Can you read? I'm well aware of their rule book because unlike you, I do my homework. I clearly stated that it is PROHIBITED WITHOUT PROOF OF AN INJURY....which it clearly is because.....wait for it....wait for it...


THEY DISALLOWED THE SHOTS YOU MORON.

Now if they disallow the shots because they needed proof, what does that mean? They feel that it is not according to their rules.

Now still waiting....if he would have taken the shots, would it have been cheating since he said he had no injury? Let me know, bro.

[travestyny]

^^^^^^^^

did he perished gargling fraud jr. small d*ck?

You're another f@g that can't handle how I beat up on your friends daily. Take your gay talk somewhere else, clown.

[IR0NFIST]

Can you read? I'm well aware of their rule book because unlike you, I do my homework. I clearly stated that it is PROHIBITED WITHOUT PROOF OF AN INJURY....which it clearly is because.....wait for it....wait for it...


THEY DISALLOWED THE SHOTS YOU MORON.

Now if they disallow the shots because they needed proof, what does that mean? They feel that it is not according to their rules.

Now still waiting....if he would have taken the shots, would it have been cheating since he said he had no injury? Let me know, bro.

It's become sadly apparent that you suffer from mental illness.

Since toradol isn't a PED, and it isn't banned by WADA, nor is it prohibited by the NSAC, the answer to your question would be a resounding "NO".

Cheating would be using WADA banned IV infusions without informing the NSAC beforehand and failing to provide a valid medical reason. Ironically enough, Floyd also failed to disclose that he was "extremely dehydrated" or that he used a banned IV infusion on his questionnaire. The NSAC doctor doing a pre-fight medical check also didn't notice any symptoms of severe dehydration from Floyd, and till this day USADA hasn't provided any proof that Floyd was even remotely dehydrated.

But I digress, If keeping this thread bumped with your nonsensical ramblings helps you cope with your mental illness, then by all means, have at it.


"I tried to tell'em it's the money team"

[Kuyukut]

You're another f@g that can't handle how I beat up on your friends daily. Take your gay talk somewhere else, clown.

idiot is mad, then its true.

go suck fraud's d*ck again.

[IR0NFIST]

idiot is mad, then its true.

go suck fraud's d*ck again.

Take it easy on the poor guy. He clearly has mental issues.


"I tried to tell'em it's the money team"

[travestyny]

It's become sadly apparent that you suffer from mental illness.

Since toradol isn't a PED, and it isn't banned by WADA, nor is it prohibited by the NSAC, the answer to your question would be a resounding "NO".

WRONG! Once again (and try to get this through your little brain this time), NSAC IS NOT A SIGNATORY TO WADA. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WADA.

Secondly, it is NOT ALLOWED by NSAC. NSAC TELLS YOU THAT PLAINLY!

I need proof that an injury exists, and I had no proof. It’s our job to keep the integrity of the sport.

http://www.boxinginlasvegas.com/Mayweather/Mayweather-Pacquiao/nsac_questions_pacquiao's_claim.htm

[/quote]

So Pacquaio having the shots without an injury would go against the integrity of the sport, huh? I wonder why.

“We don't allow Ibuprofen, Tylenol, or anti-inflammatories. It thins the blood and forces them to bleed even faster. You want the fighter to be in a natural state,” said Aguilar. “When the request was made to us, we made that evaluation, looked at our procedures, looked at our past decisions, and said no, this is not something we can do.”

Is this too hard for you to understand?

Cheating would be using WADA banned IV infusions without informing the NSAC beforehand and failing to provide a valid medical reason. Ironically enough, Floyd also failed to disclose that he was "extremely dehydrated" or that he used a banned IV infusion on his questionnaire. The NSAC doctor doing a pre-fight medical check also didn't notice any symptoms of severe dehydration from Floyd, and till this day USADA hasn't provided any proof that Floyd was even remotely dehydrated.

You seem to be an expert on NSAC rules. Go find the rule prohibiting IV for saline solution, or was that your first time looking at their rulebook?

But I digress, If keeping this thread bumped with your nonsensical ramblings helps you cope with your mental illness, then by all means, have at it.

I'm not bumping it. I'm responding to idiots who need to learn something.

Now I'm still waiting...are fighters allowed to take anti-inflammatories when there is no proof of an injury according to NSAC?

[travestyny]

idiot is mad, then its true.

go suck fraud's d*ck again.

LMAO. ME MAD? NAHHHHHHH.

You are mad that I beat up on your little homies every day. Your little man crushes are hysterical. How the **** can you feel so compelled to get upset, spout racist shlt, and otherwise just because your online friends are battered and bruised by words.

You're pathetic. Go choke on a big black kawk. But not mine, f@g boy.

[IR0NFIST]

WRONG! Once again (and try to get this through your little brain this time), NSAC IS NOT A SIGNATORY TO WADA. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WADA.

Secondly, it is NOT ALLOWED by NSAC. NSAC TELLS YOU THAT PLAINLY!

I need proof that an injury exists, and I had no proof. It’s our job to keep the integrity of the sport.

http://www.boxinginlasvegas.com/Mayweather/Mayweather-Pacquiao/nsac_questions_pacquiao's_claim.htm

So Pacquaio having the shots without an injury would go against the integrity of the sport, huh? I wonder why.

“We don't allow Ibuprofen, Tylenol, or anti-inflammatories. It thins the blood and forces them to bleed even faster. You want the fighter to be in a natural state,” said Aguilar. “When the request was made to us, we made that evaluation, looked at our procedures, looked at our past decisions, and said no, this is not something we can do.”

Is this too hard for you to understand?



You seem to be an expert on NSAC rules. Go find the rule prohibiting IV for saline solution, or was that your first time looking at their rulebook?



I'm not bumping it. I'm responding to idiots who need to learn something.

Now I'm still waiting...are fighters allowed to take anti-inflammatories when there is no proof of an injury according to NSAC?[/QUOTE]

Did you take your meds today?