Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[travestyny]

The lone fl0mo travestyny is so desperate to make this an issue. He's struggling to form a credible argument against toradol, so instead he's resorted to making meaningless posts about Nick Diaz lol. I almost feel bad for the guy... almost. Over 1000 posts and yet toradol still hasn't been added to the WADA banned list (right alongside IV infusions). What's even more sad is that this thread appears to have turned into another 'Floyd banned IV' discussion.

Poor travestyny.

Look at this clown.Still mentioning my name out of nowhere. Dude, I don't come on here talking about you. I have no need to mention your name. I already buried you. You're being wayyyy too transparent, and wayyyy too ****ing sentimental. You're so mad about what I did to you that in the end I made you an effeminate obsessed troll who can only make ****** little images because she found out that she doesn't have the mental capacity to debate any topic based upon fact, and you hope these dumb ass images are going to repair your crushed feelings. It's not going to work. I have 1000 posts, and you've been trying to dig yourself out of your grave since post #23.

BOTH YOU, AND I, WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER WHAT I DID TO YOU. Everybody in this thread witnessed me embarrass you over and over again. TRY TAKING IT LIKE A MAN, YOU LITTLE BlTCH.

[travestyny]

Notice where it says this medical practice is PROHIBITED at ALL TIMES WITHOUT PRIOR TUE approval

Very interesting.

Please point me to where I can learn more about the****utic use exemptions.

Would that be the document known as the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions?

Heard a nasty rumor that it is irrelevant.

the istue is irrelavent

it is irrelevant for home iv

But WADA says it is MANDATORY. You know:

Mandatory(adj): Required by law or rules. Compulsory.

1.0 IntroductionandScope
The International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions is a mandatory International Standard developed as part of the World Anti-Doping Program.
The purpose of the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions is to establish (a) the conditions that must be satisfied in order for a The****utic Use Exemption (or TUE) to be granted, permitting the presence of a Prohibited Substance in an Athlete’s Sample or the Athlete’s Use or Attempted Use, Possession and/or Administration or Attempted Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method for the****utic reasons; (b) the responsibilities imposed on Anti-Doping Organizations in making and communicating TUE decisions; (c) the process for an Athlete to apply for a TUE; (d) the process for an Athlete to get a TUE granted by one Anti-Doping Organization recognized by another Anti-Doping Organization; (e) the process for WADA to review TUE decisions; and (f) the strict confidentiality provisions that apply to the TUE process.

Maybe you can help us out with that contradictory information. Is it irrelevant, or what? Let me know, bro.

[Dosumpthin]

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval. WADA has justified the inclusion of IV infusions on the Prohibited List given the intent of some athletes to manipulate their plasma volume levels in order to mask the use of a prohibited substance and/or to distort the values in the Athlete Biological Passport. Further, it must be clearly stated that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild rehydration or help speed recovery is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies (emergency TUE), in-patient care, surgery, or clinical investigations for diagnostic purposes.---------------- usada 5th March 2014 dumbsumthin

Notice where it says this medical practice is PROHIBITED at ALL TIMES WITHOUT PRIOR TUE approval

"Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons....."

That's not the same as you posted before idiot.


I know you won't admit you're a dumbass for trying to pass off that other document because you're a pact@rd.

At least you smartened up and found something before May 1st. 2015. Too bad your too ****** to read and comprhend at the same time.

And notice USADA interpetation of the ISTUE has changed to accomodate widespread IV use in the UFC.

Nevertheless - the ISTUE will always be the official rules for ADOs AND ATHELETES.


You know the ISTUE that you claim is irrelevant?


Hahaha hahaha. ****** *******.

[Dosumpthin]

Very interesting.

Please point me to where I can learn more about the****utic use exemptions.

Would that be the document known as the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions?

Heard a nasty rumor that it is irrelevant.





But WADA says it is MANDATORY. You know:

Mandatory(adj): Required by law or rules. Compulsory.



Maybe you can help us out with that contradictory information. Is it irrelevant, or what? Let me know, bro.

Adp02 get over here! Come get your pact@rd buddies and bring them up to speed. They are getting destroyed.


Bwhahahahaha.

[Dosumpthin]

How many ped cheats has usada caught, then check how many fights usada has tested for, then do the same with vada ******, vada has a much better conviction rate so there goes you irrelevant arguement nobjockey

WADA - vada cheap knock off



MCDONALDS - mcdowells cheap knock off




"They have the big mac. We have the big Mick"

https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=PzTiRNY2GGQ

[Shape up]

Very interesting.

Please point me to where I can learn more about the****utic use exemptions.

Would that be the document known as the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions?

Heard a nasty rumor that it is irrelevant.





But WADA says it is MANDATORY. You know:

Mandatory(adj): Required by law or rules. Compulsory.



Maybe you can help us out with that contradictory information. Is it irrelevant, or what? Let me know, bro.

No, you need the section that covers requirements to obtain a TUE, certain requirement need to be met or otherwise a $150k fee will cover it

[Shape up]

Very interesting.

Please point me to where I can learn more about the****utic use exemptions.

Would that be the document known as the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions?

Heard a nasty rumor that it is irrelevant.





But WADA says it is MANDATORY. You know:

Mandatory(adj): Required by law or rules. Compulsory.



Maybe you can help us out with that contradictory information. Is it irrelevant, or what? Let me know, bro.

"Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons....."

That's not the same as you posted before idiot.


I know you won't admit you're a dumbass for trying to pass off that other document because you're a pact@rd.

At least you smartened up and found something before May 1st. 2015. Too bad your too ****** to read and comprhend at the same time.

And notice USADA interpetation of the ISTUE has changed to accomodate widespread IV use in the UFC.

Nevertheless - the ISTUE will always be the official rules for ADOs AND ATHELETES.


You know the ISTUE that you claim is irrelevant?


Hahaha hahaha. ****** *******.

No, ufc is actually sticking to the rules, bj penn was pulled from ufc199 for using an IV ******

[Shape up]

WADA - vada cheap knock off



MCDONALDS - mcdowells cheap knock off




"They have the big mac. We have the big Mick"





https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=PzTiRNY2GGQ

Vada has a better track record than usada, undeniable FACT

[travestyny]

No, you need the section that covers requirements to obtain a TUE, certain requirement need to be met or otherwise a $150k fee will cover it

So you now admit that the ISTUE is relevant?


But to reconcile admitting that you were wrong, you speculate that USADA was paid off?

Here's a question: If USADA was paid off to protect Floyd,

1. Why would he need an IV when they could tell him when the tests were coming and ensure that he has cycled through his PED's before any tests.

2. Why would they reveal his IV use to anyone? If they are so well paid off, they should keep their mouths shut, tell the labs that any finding of an IV is normal, and keep it moving.

3. Why would he have to apply for a TUE? I'm sure that for a hefty fee, they would work with him so that he would not create a paper trail of this alleged deceit. He would not have to involve 3 or more doctors on the TUEC in the process, as well as WADA.

What exactly did he pay for if he paid an extravagant amount to USADA, yet they couldn't hide any of his activity. In fact, because of the TUE, they even had to upload all of the information on a database and open it up to review by WADA. Does this make sense to you? A smart businessman paying for...absolutely nothing....EXCEPT DRUG TESTING.

[travestyny]

No, ufc is actually sticking to the rules, bj penn was pulled from ufc199 for using an IV ******

Did BJ Penn declare the desire for IV use BEFORE having it, or did he reveal it AFTER having it?

Or, to use a term you've grown fond of, did he declare his desire to have an IV IN ADVANCE to USADA? Floyd Mayweather did.

That is a key distinction to be made.