Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • be infused, the rate of infusion
    and any other relevant clinical information from the treating physician
    should be included. It must be demonstrated why an alternative permitted
    therapy, for example oral rehydration in case of dehydration, is not a valid
    option. Any existing co-morbidities that would influence the decision for
    granting a TUE should also be included.
    $150,000 took care of that problem ****head

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
      WHEN IS A TUE NOT REQUIRED FOR AN IV INFUSION?

      If the athlete has an acute medical condition where an IV line was essential for treatment in a hospital admission, surgical procedure, or clinical investigation. Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete with signs of circulatory compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgical procedure, and IV line in the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc…
      Clinical investigations to diagnosis medical conditions, such a medical imaging, may also require IV administration of non-prohibited medicine which is permitted.
      In emergency circumstances, IVs may also be given by paramedical staff or physicians on the field of play, but an emergency TUE application is required as soon as reasonably possible after treatment has been received. Examples may include a semi- or unconscious athlete, an athlete who cannot tolerate oral fluids, or treatment of an acute injury.
      IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.
      no need to interpret this, it's very easy to understand

      No need to explain why this article is by definition irrelevant.

      Go back check the date this was added to USADA website and be mindful of your own ******ity.


      ****** pact@rd.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
        be infused, the rate of infusion
        and any other relevant clinical information from the treating physician
        should be included. It must be demonstrated why an alternative permitted
        therapy, for example oral rehydration in case of dehydration, is not a valid
        option. Any existing co-morbidities that would influence the decision for
        granting a TUE should also be included.
        $150,000 took care of that problem ****head

        How much should a wada signatory charge if you and Hauser feels 100,000 (actual cost) is too much?


        Vada charges 35,000 for b level fighters, outsources sample collection, has 4 full time employees, doesn't follow WADA ABP ADAMS protocols and was founded by Victor Conte over lunch in a Vegas diner. At least they do CIR testing (400.00 each), but USADA does that and more.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
          Posted it twice because I realise you guys don't comprehend very well
          Post it all you want. When presented with the truth, you said the truth is irrelevant. LMAO!

          You're done, kid.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
            How much should a wada signatory charge if you and Hauser feels 100,000 (actual cost) is too much?


            Vada charges 35,000 for b level fighters, outsources sample collection, has 4 full time employees, doesn't follow WADA ABP ADAMS protocols and was founded by Victor Conte over lunch in a Vegas diner. At least they do CIR testing (400.00 each), but USADA does that and more.
            How many ped cheats has usada caught, then check how many fights usada has tested for, then do the same with vada ******, vada has a much better conviction rate so there goes you irrelevant arguement nobjockey

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
              No need to explain why this article is by definition irrelevant.

              Go back check the date this was added to USADA website and be mindful of your own ******ity.


              ****** pact@rd.
              Yeah you should be careful, the first posting I put up of that rule was 2014 you dumb ******, idiotic moron

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                Yeah you should be careful, the first posting I put up of that rule was 2014 you dumb ******, idiotic moron
                I need to see your receipt.

                Comment


                • The lone fl0mo travestyny is so desperate to make this an issue. He's struggling to form a credible argument against toradol, so instead he's resorted to making meaningless posts about Nick Diaz lol. I almost feel bad for the guy... almost. Over 1000 posts and yet toradol still hasn't been added to the WADA banned list (right alongside IV infusions). What's even more sad is that this thread appears to have turned into another 'Floyd banned IV' discussion.

                  Poor travestyny.

                  Comment


                  • Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval. WADA has justified the inclusion of IV infusions on the Prohibited List given the intent of some athletes to manipulate their plasma volume levels in order to mask the use of a prohibited substance and/or to distort the values in the Athlete Biological Passport. Further, it must be clearly stated that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild rehydration or help speed recovery is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies (emergency TUE), in-patient care, surgery, or clinical investigations for diagnostic purposes.---------------- usada 5th March 2014 dumbsumthin

                    Comment


                    • Notice where it says this medical practice is PROHIBITED at ALL TIMES WITHOUT PRIOR TUE approval

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP