Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[Dosumpthin]

Floyd was allowed to delay many hours then actually look straight into the DCO's face and say after all that time, "I cannot urinate" ****** Floydies!!!

Urine occurs at 1 ml/min but goes way up when you drink like we saw Floyd drinking. With 1 liter of fluids it can get up to 8 or 9ml/min. So in 10 minutes time, you have your 90 ml!!!! One can be ultra conservative and still have lots of time to spare.

So he shouldn't have had to use an IV to get the full amount of urine which was only 90ml.

With Floyd being allowed to drink and have this IV, what's the point of a CIR testing when the values will all be skewed and Floyd can say its due to the approved TUE that I got 3 weeks after the fight because Floyd knows USADA and USADA helped Floyd out!

The NSAC refused to give Manny the Toradol. So next question is can you still fight without the Toradol? Well, that left Manny no choice but you Floydies are not smart enough to understand all that!

There's the problem.

You've wasted 1 year of life posting about **** you have no idea about.

[Dosumpthin]

WHEN IS A TUE NOT REQUIRED FOR AN IV INFUSION?

If the athlete has an acute medical condition where an IV line was essential for treatment in a hospital admission, surgical procedure, or clinical investigation. Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete with signs of circulatory compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgical procedure, and IV line in the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc…
Clinical investigations to diagnosis medical conditions, such a medical imaging, may also require IV administration of non-prohibited medicine which is permitted.
In emergency circumstances, IVs may also be given by paramedical staff or physicians on the field of play, but an emergency TUE application is required as soon as reasonably possible after treatment has been received. Examples may include a semi- or unconscious athlete, an athlete who cannot tolerate oral fluids, or treatment of an acute injury.
IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.
Again, it CLEARY states IN ADVANCE, that's not my opinion, that's WADA REGULATIONS, I asked you to show me where it CLEARY STATES that you can get a retro TUE for a home IV, what you posted does not say that loser, keep trying numbnuts

All tues are required in advance.


Do you not understand this?


Are you dumb?


This is why Wada has a retroactive clause.


The end.

****** pact@rds

[Shape up]

I will take that as you can't find anything to back up your arguement, your both as ****** as each other, probably the same person anyway, you can't argue with what WADA states because they wrote the rule book, you 2 or 1 which ever it may be need to have a good hard look at yourselves and remove your tongues from floyds arse

[travestyny]

I will take that as you can't find anything to back up your arguement, your both as ****** as each other, probably the same person anyway, you can't argue with what WADA states because they wrote the rule book, you 2 or 1 which ever it may be need to have a good hard look at yourselves and remove your tongues from floyds arse

1. Learn how to use punctuation before you try to call someone ******.

2. Learn the difference between "your" and "you're" before you try to call someone ******.

3. How the **** can you claim anyone is arguing against WADA when you've been shown statements from a WADA spokesman and the ISTUE.

4. Tell me how my ass tastes, bltch. You lose. Now **** off.

[Dosumpthin]

I will take that as you can't find anything to back up your arguement, your both as ****** as each other, probably the same person anyway, you can't argue with what WADA states because they wrote the rule book, you 2 or 1 which ever it may be need to have a good hard look at yourselves and remove your tongues from floyds arse

Full pact@rd.

Look at him.

Smh.

"You can't argue with what wada states"
"The istue is irrelevant"
-shapeup

Unreal. Very ****** people.

Its comical. I shouldn't relish in others people pain but it's damn funny.

[Shape up]

Again you have not been able to show me where it specifies a retro TUE can be issued for a home IV, all you have done is try and put your own spin on what you THINK the ISTUE means, you both are so far up floyds arse that only your shoelaces are hanging out losers, you still haven't addressed the ISTUE point about if there is a therapudic alternative to the IV then that should be used ****heads

[Dosumpthin]

Again you have not been able to show me where it specifies a retro TUE can be issued for a home IV, all you have done is try and put your own spin on what you THINK the ISTUE means

If a non-prohibited substance is infused or injected without a concurrent hospital
admission, surgical procedure or clinical investigation; a TUE must be submitted
for this Prohibited Method if more than 50 mL of fluid per a 6-hour period is
infused or injected.
If a Prohibited Substance is administered via IV infusion or injection a TUE
application must be submitted for the Prohibited Substance regardless of
whether the infusion is less than 50 mL or the setting/circumstances under
which it is administered. In situations of medical emergency or clinical time
constraints, a retroactive TUE application is acceptable (ISTUE 2015 article 4.3).

- TUE Physician Guidelines
Medical Information to Support the Decisions of TUECs
INTRAVENOUS INFUSIONS

(as referenced in the ISTUE)

you both are so far up floyds arse that only your shoelaces are hanging out losers, you still haven't addressed the ISTUE point about if there is a therapudic alternative to the IV then that should be used ****heads

A detailed description of the substance to be infused, the rate of infusion
and any other relevant clinical information from the treating physician
should be included. It must be demonstrated why an alternative permitted
therapy, for example oral rehydration in case of dehydration, is not a valid
option. Any existing co-morbidities that would influence the decision for
granting a TUE should also be included.

- TUE Physician Guidelines
Medical Information to Support the Decisions of TUECs
INTRAVENOUS INFUSIONS


I know you're a ****** pact@rd, so I won't explain this to you - I am just merely showing you as you requested. I wouldn't want you to accuse me of "interpeting" anything.


Dumbass. Go do some research, like I told you before, and rejoin the thread when you're properly informed.

[Shape up]

WHEN IS A TUE NOT REQUIRED FOR AN IV INFUSION?

If the athlete has an acute medical condition where an IV line was essential for treatment in a hospital admission, surgical procedure, or clinical investigation. Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete with signs of circulatory compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgical procedure, and IV line in the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc…
Clinical investigations to diagnosis medical conditions, such a medical imaging, may also require IV administration of non-prohibited medicine which is permitted.
In emergency circumstances, IVs may also be given by paramedical staff or physicians on the field of play, but an emergency TUE application is required as soon as reasonably possible after treatment has been received. Examples may include a semi- or unconscious athlete, an athlete who cannot tolerate oral fluids, or treatment of an acute injury.
IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.
no need to interpret this, it's very easy to understand

[Shape up]

WHEN IS A TUE NOT REQUIRED FOR AN IV INFUSION?

If the athlete has an acute medical condition where an IV line was essential for treatment in a hospital admission, surgical procedure, or clinical investigation. Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete with signs of circulatory compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgical procedure, and IV line in the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc…
Clinical investigations to diagnosis medical conditions, such a medical imaging, may also require IV administration of non-prohibited medicine which is permitted.
In emergency circumstances, IVs may also be given by paramedical staff or physicians on the field of play, but an emergency TUE application is required as soon as reasonably possible after treatment has been received. Examples may include a semi- or unconscious athlete, an athlete who cannot tolerate oral fluids, or treatment of an acute injury.
IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.
no need to interpret this, it's very easy to understand

[Shape up]

Posted it twice because I realise you guys don't comprehend very well