Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by IR0NFIST View Post
    Lol at "ir0n zombie". That's exactly the kind of insult I would expect from my 6 year old niece. BTW, have you sent all of that groundbreaking data on toradol to WADA yet? Maybe they'll finally decide to add it onto their prohibited list. I mean, it's been around sports for as long as 2009, yet for some reason it isn't labeled by the most prominent anti-doping agency to be a PED.
    So you ducked the question a second time.


    Sure, I'll send my findings to WADA, as soon as you gather your information and send it to NSAC. Maybe they'll even make the fight that ruined your life into a no-contest.

    How about that?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      So you ducked the question a second time.


      Sure, I'll send my findings to WADA, as soon as you gather your information and send it to NSAC. Maybe they'll even make the fight that ruined your life into a no-contest.

      How about that?
      Tel. : +1 514 904 9232
      Fax : +1 514 904 8650

      That's WADA's contact info. You should send them all of the valuable data you've collected on toradol. Who knows, maybe your findings will finally convince them to add it onto their prohibited list. If not, then all of the valuable time and effort you've dedicated on this thread would be for nothing. Be sure to record your call, it would make for a funny Youtube video.

      I would imagine your conversation with WADA to go something like this...


      *ring* *ring*

      WADA rep: Hello, what can I help you with today sir?
      travestyny: suh
      WADA rep: Do you need help with something?
      travestyny: Poochiao on dem stair roids!
      WADA rep: Poochiao? Are you referring to Pacquiao?
      travestyny: yeh!
      WADA rep: What steroids did he take?
      travestyny: tory doll
      WADA rep: And when did he take take this substance?
      travestyny: uhhh... *awkward silence*
      WADA rep: Has he ever taken it during a fight?
      travestyny: uhhh... *more awkward silence*
      WADA rep: I'm sorry, sir, but toradol isn't on our prohibited list.
      travestyny: but you see i got deez documents...

      Your call has ended.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by IR0NFIST View Post
        Tel. : (702) 486-2575
        Fax : (702) 486-2577

        That's NSAC's contact info. I'm gonna send them all of the valuable data I've collected on toradol. Who knows, maybe my findings will finally convince them to change the fight to a no contest. If not, then all of the valuable time and effort I've dedicated on this thread making dumb ass posts and getting destroyed will be for nothing. I'll be sure to record my call and further embarrass myself.

        I would imagine my conversation with NSAC to go something like this...

        *ring* *ring*

        NSAC rep: Hello, what can I help you with today sir?
        IR0N Zombie: suh
        NSAC rep: Do you need help with something?
        IR0N Zombie: Poochiao got robbed!
        NSAC rep: Poochiao? Are you referring to Pacquiao?
        IR0N Zombie: yeh!
        NSAC rep: What's the issue?
        IR0N Zombie: Why you aint let him to take tory doll?
        NSAC rep: Well he could not prove an injury.
        IR0N Zombie: uhhh... *awkward silence*
        NSAC rep: Is there anything else I can help you with?
        IR0N Zombie: uhhh... *more awkward silence*
        NSAC rep: I'm sorry, sir, but we don't allow toradol without proof of an injury.
        IR0N Zombie: but you see i got deez documents...

        Your call has ended.

        Fixed it for you, z0mbie cl0wn.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by IR0NFIST View Post
          You don't need a TUE for toradol because it isn't banned by WADA. And the NSAC is a sanctioning body not a anti-doping agency you dunce.
          Let's see what USADA and NSAC had to say about this:

          USADA: It had nothing to do with us at all. Pacquiao either made a ****** mistake or took a gamble and lost.

          "It was not an anti-doping issue. The real question is why his camp checked 'no' on the disclosure. Either they made a terrible mistake to not follow the rules or they were trying not to give information to the other side. I'm not sure there's a middle ground."
          http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_...houlder-injury

          NSAC: Flat out not allowed without proof of an injury.

          “We don't allow Ibuprofen, Tylenol, or anti-inflammatories. It thins the blood and forces them to bleed even faster. You want the fighter to be in a natural state,” said Aguilar. “When the request was made to us, we made that evaluation, looked at our procedures, looked at our past decisions, and said no, this is not something we can do.”
          http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...icle-1.2210373

          Your whole argument is centered on Pacquiao being allowed to break NSAC's rules. That's pretty ****ing dumb. Stop crying, Z0MBIE boy. It's over.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Fixed it for you, z0mbie cl0wn.
            That's actually pretty funny, it's a shame that you had to copy and paste my post though. I understand that you're incapable of forming your own unique response and therefore need to copy and paste other people's material.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by IR0NFIST View Post
              That's actually pretty funny, it's a shame that you had to copy and paste my post though. I understand that you're incapable of forming your own unique response and therefore need to copy and paste other people's material.
              It was neither witty nor interesting enough to do anything more with.

              Just wanted to point out how lame you are.

              Comment


              • Non disclosure about dehydration is breaking the rules ****head, but seeing the IV was obviously kept from NSAC knowledge purposely, NSAC didn't have a chance to stop fluids IV

                Comment


                • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  Let's see what USADA and NSAC had to say about this:

                  USADA: It had nothing to do with us at all. Pacquiao either made a ****** mistake or took a gamble and lost.

                  "It was not an anti-doping issue. The real question is why his camp checked 'no' on the disclosure. Either they made a terrible mistake to not follow the rules or they were trying not to give information to the other side. I'm not sure there's a middle ground."
                  http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_...houlder-injury

                  NSAC: Flat out not allowed without proof of an injury.

                  “We don't allow Ibuprofen, Tylenol, or anti-inflammatories. It thins the blood and forces them to bleed even faster. You want the fighter to be in a natural state,” said Aguilar. “When the request was made to us, we made that evaluation, looked at our procedures, looked at our past decisions, and said no, this is not something we can do.”
                  http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...icle-1.2210373

                  Your whole argument is centered on Pacquiao being allowed to break NSAC's rules. That's pretty ****ing dumb. Stop crying, Z0MBIE boy. It's over.
                  "It was not an anti-doping issue. The real question is why his camp checked 'no' on the disclosure."

                  Not an anti-doping issue? I'm glad we got that cleared up. As for your question, this statement from Michael Koncz should provide you with the answer that you so desperately need.

                  "Number one, Manny didn't check the box,” said Koncz. “I checked it. It was just an inadvertent mistake. If I was trying to hide anything, would I have listed all the medications on the sheet that he intended to use? We weren't trying to hide anything. I just don't think I read the questionnaire correctly."

                  http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...icle-1.2210373

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by IR0NFIST View Post
                    "It was not an anti-doping issue. The real question is why his camp checked 'no' on the disclosure."

                    Not an anti-doping issue? I'm glad we got that cleared up. As for your question, this statement from Michael Koncz should provide you with the answer that you so desperately need.

                    "Number one, Manny didn't check the box,” said Koncz. “I checked it. It was just an inadvertent mistake. If I was trying to hide anything, would I have listed all the medications on the sheet that he intended to use? We weren't trying to hide anything. I just don't think I read the questionnaire correctly."

                    http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...icle-1.2210373
                    Pay attention. No one ever said it was an anti-doping issue. What was said is that toradol can be abused as a PED, and this has been proven. The information was already given to you.

                    You go to Michael Koncz? LMAO. Haven't you realized by now that everyone on Pac's team tells Pac to shut up, and they speak for him to protect him. You'd probably deny that, so I'll just leave you with this:

                    Nevada Athletic Commission executive director Bob Bennett said Pacquiao filled out the form himself and understood the questions.
                    http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_...houlder-injury

                    Even if he didn't check it himself, which the executive director clearly states he did, he damn sure signed the thing. So...you are left with nothing.

                    Just give up. You can't win. It's over.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                      Non disclosure about dehydration is breaking the rules ****head, but seeing the IV was obviously kept from NSAC knowledge purposely, NSAC didn't have a chance to stop fluids IV
                      Find me where an IV infusion of saline is prohibited in NSAC's rules BEFORE or ON May 2nd, 2015.


                      Until then, shut up, bltch.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP