Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[travestyny]

If I'm the moron then what should we call someone that is worse? I see that you do not know what you are talking about. NEXT!!!


The initial point is just stating a fact that if you dilute 400ng/ml by 8X then you reduce so its 50ng/ml. As he stated, as time elapses, the drug is removed and then it becomes easier for the user to dilute below the cutoff levels. The graph is showing this for THC and another for *******, as he explained. Its so simple to understand that even a moron would understand but you, it looks like you do not understand! So what can we call you? Too funny!


After initial dilution:
400/8 = 50

After 16 hours elapsed:
200/8 = 25

After 32 hours elapsed:
100/8 = 12.5

After 48 hours elapsed:
50/8 = 6.25


The above reflects the diluted line. Its simple

LMAO. You're so ****ing dumb.

So you're saying that in 0 time, you dilute from 400ng to 50ng?

Is that what you are saying?

You do see that the initial B and J are both on the zero time mark, right? LMAO!!!!!

SO TELL ME...HOW DID THE MARIJUANA GO FROM 400NG TO 50NG IN ZERO TIME? LMAOOOOOOOOO!!!!

[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-12%20at%205.34.56%20PM.png[/IMG]

[IR0NFIST]

Give up. It has nothing to do with USADA. WADA allows toradol. NSAC doesn't for various reasons. You already know this but you can't handle the truth.

Pacquaio's team attempted to cheat and were stopped. Same as Margarito's team attempted to cheat and was stopped. Did it matter that Margarito never actually threw a punch? He was still punished.

So stating that it doesn't matter because Pacquaio didn't take it is not so relevant, is it? The only reason he wasn't punished is because it's not as atrocious of a crime as putting plaster in your gloves, and fairness to his team would be reasonable in the event that they didn't know you can't abuse it.

*But we all know his team would have to be a bunch of fools to believe they can load up on toradol with no injury. And what doctor attempts to give a shot of toradol with no injury? Dr. ElAttrache, Pacquaio, and Arum have all gone on record saying Pacquaio was perfectly fine before the fight.

Now stop embarrassing yourself. Get back in your grave.

Is toradol banned by WADA?

[travestyny]

is toradol banned by wada?

can you read mutha****er? I just wrote that it is not.

Now, is it prohibited by nsac? Yes or no?

[IR0NFIST]

[ADP02]

LMAO. You're so ****ing dumb.

So you're saying that in 0 time, you dilute from 400ng to 50ng?

Is that what you are saying?

You do see that the initial B and J are both on the zero time mark, right? LMAO!!!!!

Read the below. Even you should understand it. If you cannot then nobody can help you!!!

For *******, if the user dilutes 8X then the number of metabolites is reduced to about 2500 ng/ml from the initial level of 20, 000 ..... which is way above the 300ng/ml cutoff. BUT as time elapses, ******* or any other drug is eliminated from the body.

The below says you CANNOT dilute 20, 000 to make it be below 300ng/ml cutoff. PERIOD Using your logic, you can if you continually drink 1 liter or whatever you are desperately trying to say! You tell me ...

Its wrong logic for a number of reasons. One he says you cannot but secondly, his whole point is that by drinking quickly 1 to 2 liters of water, you can dilute your urine. Not drinking 1 to 2 liters continuously and the other graph points out that after you drink 1 liter of water your urine comes back to normal way before 48 hours!!!

It's simple but you need to relax, focus and try to understand it first.


"For ******* users, typical urine levels of ******* metabolite are on the order of many tens of thousands of ng/mL and even higher, so even a 10-fold dilution will still leave urine levels well above the screening cut-off values (300 ng/mL of ******* metabolite). cf. the chart below."


The same can be true of opiates and amphetamines, simply because of the large doses of these drugs which are commonly consumed by abusers and the very high resulting urine concentrations. However, after the body has had some time after dosing to metabolize and eliminate these drugs/metabolites and their urine levels are reduced to only a few thousand ng/mL, then dilution may allow a user even of large amounts of drug to escape detection."



.

[travestyny]

You talk about how sad I am for stomping you pacRoaches into the ground repeatedly.

How sad are you for making all of these dumb images? This dude ruined your ****ing life.

[travestyny]

Read the below. Even you should understand it. If you cannot then nobody can help you!!!

For *******, if the user dilutes 8X then the number of metabolites is reduced to about 2500 ng/ml from the initial level of 20, 000 ..... which is way above the 300ng/ml cutoff. BUT as time elapses, ******* or any other drug is eliminated from the body.

The below says you CANNOT dilute 20, 000 to make it be below 300ng/ml cutoff. PERIOD Using your logic, you can if you continually drink 1 liter or whatever you are desperately trying to say! You tell me ...

Its wrong logic for a number of reasons. One he says you cannot but secondly, his whole point is that by drinking quickly 1 to 2 liters of water, you can dilute your urine. Not drinking 1 to 2 liters continuously and the other graph points out that after you drink 1 liter of water your urine comes back to normal way before 48 hours!!!

It's simple but you need to relax, focus and try to understand it first.


"For ******* users, typical urine levels of ******* metabolite are on the order of many tens of thousands of ng/mL and even higher, so even a 10-fold dilution will still leave urine levels well above the screening cut-off values (300 ng/mL of ******* metabolite). cf. the chart below."


The same can be true of opiates and amphetamines, simply because of the large doses of these drugs which are commonly consumed by abusers and the very high resulting urine concentrations. However, after the body has had some time after dosing to metabolize and eliminate these drugs/metabolites and their urine levels are reduced to only a few thousand ng/mL, then dilution may allow a user even of large amounts of drug to escape detection."
.

What the **** are you talking about. I'm very aware of what the study says.

Stop deflecting. It's not going to work. I'm still waiting for you to tell me:

ACCORDING TO THE CHART, HOW MUCH TIME DOES IT TAKE TO DROP 400NG OF MARIJUANA METABOLITE TO 50NG BY DILUTION.

WAITINGGGGGGG.....

[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-12%20at%205.34.56%20PM.png[/IMG]

[IR0NFIST]

can you read mutha****er? I just wrote that it is not.

Now, is it prohibited by nsac? Yes or no?

So Pacquiao was "attempting to cheat" by taking a non-prohibited, perfectly legal shot of toradol to treat his shoulder that was weakened due to an injury he suffered in training camp?

[travestyny]

So Pacquiao was "attempting to cheat" by taking a non-prohibited, perfectly legal, shot of toradol to treat his weakened shoulder that was injured during training camp?

Did you answer the question?

Is toradol prohibited by NSAC when there is no proof of an injury? It's a simple question, dude.

[IR0NFIST]

Did you answer the question?

Is toradol prohibited by NSAC when there is no proof of an injury? It's a simple question, dude.

The NSAC isn't an anti-doping agency, genius.