Of course he is everyone knows beating porter and a bunch of bums is more impressive then beating Cotto, Trout, Lara. And despite the fact canelo has unified titles and is higher on p4p rankings and brook couldn't even separate himself from fighters at 147 and has done nothing at 154 but yeah he's better then canelo. LMAO at GGG fanboys trying to justify this fight that even the WBA is calling a mismatch and won't sanction.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is kell brook better than canelo?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by larryusa View Posttriangle theories....lol
And considering how close Brook and Canelo's styles are (especially back then), it is quite relevant to compare them..
So funny to compare these guys right? Once again you fail at being a boxing fan
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostOf course he is everyone knows beating porter and a bunch of bums is more impressive then beating Cotto, Trout, Lara. And despite the fact canelo has unified titles and is higher on p4p rankings and brook couldn't even separate himself from fighters at 147 and has done nothing at 154 but yeah he's better then canelo. LMAO at GGG fanboys trying to justify this fight that even the WBA is calling a mismatch and won't sanction.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PivotandRoll View PostHow the **** is that a triangle theory...You asked for a basis in which to compare them and I provided one. It's not my fault your small brain couldn't remember they both fought them guys.
And considering how close Brook and Canelo's styles are (especially back then), it is quite relevant to compare them..
So funny to compare these guys right? Once again you fail at being a boxing fan
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryusa View Posttriangle theories....lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryusa View PostSo Brook could beat Lara, Trout and Cotto?...would he even beat Kirkland or Angulo?
Kirkland is glass as we all know. He would be dangerous early but Kell lands one right hand and James is hitting the deck.
For the record I didn't score one of these fights as a Canelo win.
But Trout/Brook...Trout doesn't have the legs or power to compete.. UD Brook
Cotto/Brook....Damn, Great Fight. Cotto's body work against Kell's precise right hands and jabs. Two of my favorites. Damn 50/50
Lara/Brook .....BAD STYLE MATCH UP.... Brook would be chasing a win and would need to eck out a stoppage ala Leonard/Hearns 1...Not sure he can as it's not his natural style
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostCanelo fought Ndou the SAME year he fought cottos brother. How many times did we hear from Cotto fans well his brother stunned canelo in 1 round (before getting knocked out) so of course the bigger stronger elite Miguel will dominate canelo. How did that work? Stop bringing up fights when canelo was basically a green teenager. Fights half a decade ago are a liftetime ago for canelo. He is is a much better fighter now then he was then unless you just think Jose Cotto is a better fighter then Miguel Cotto. LMAO
And I brought the fights up
And for the record Brook whoops Canelo if Canelo has the balls after Brook takes out GGG to take the fight. (or if he even gets by Smith)
Comment
-
Why are people always bringing up Kirkland and angulo like they're good wins?
On topic no he doesn't have better odds against ggg. Ggg is a 4/1 favorite against canelo and against brook is a 6/1. I trust bookies more than randoms online.
If brook fought Canelo though he might win but I don't think he get the decision because canelo always gets the benefit of the doubt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PivotandRoll View PostNot a GGG fanboy and don't think Kell should be fighting GGG, but I didn't have Canelo beating any of those guys tbh. Best I can give him is a draw with Trout and Cotto.
Comment
Comment