Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is kell brook better than canelo?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Brook is like Canelo without the slow feet and bad stamina.

    Canelo is poor mans version of Sugar Ezekiel Brook.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by RussTBE View Post
      To be honest if they fought at 154 i would see kell giving canelo a very hard time. Canelo has terrible cement feet and brook might box his ass up. This might sound ridiculous but brook vs GGG might actually be more competitive than canelo vs ggg. If kell is comfortable at the weight stylistically he can give GGG more problems before he probably gets knocked out. Canelo is too flat footed to evade GGG and would just get walked down and beaten thats why hes scared shitless.
      evading Golovkin isn't the issue; the focus is keeping outside of that mid punching ranging where Golovkin does basically all of his work. Cut the distance short, or keep the fight long; not simple, but it's that simple.

      People are sleeping on it, but Alvarez boxes beautifully from close range and mid-range; decorated amateur or not, Golovkin, to me anyway, has never shown the ability to actively keep a fight long.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by RussTBE View Post
        Just because he beats up alot of bums doesnt mean hes a bum lol.
        He's 30 and Jojo Dan is his 3rd best win. He's a bum.

        Comment


        • #24
          At 154 i'd tip brook over canelo, khan was outboxing him and if he didnt have a glass jaw, theres a good chance he would have continued to do so. Lara outboxed him and hes not a large guy. No reason brook couldnt outbox him too. find it strange that golovkin v canelo is considered a superfight, but golovkin v brook is considered a circus fight, yet i bet the bookies odds would be pretty close if brook fought canelo.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by CaneloMaidana View Post
            He's 30 and Jojo Dan is his 3rd best win. He's a bum.
            you must know something that the ring magazine didnt, when they had him number 1 ranked welterweight.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
              At 154 i'd tip brook over canelo, khan was outboxing him and if he didnt have a glass jaw, theres a good chance he would have continued to do so. Lara outboxed him and hes not a large guy. No reason brook couldnt outbox him too. find it strange that golovkin v canelo is considered a superfight, but golovkin v brook is considered a circus fight, yet i bet the bookies odds would be pretty close if brook fought canelo.
              Because kell is a welterweight with a bum resume. Seriously Danny's resume is better.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by PivotandRoll View Post
                Would Brook beat Angulo? Seriously is that even a question? Brook right hand busts his face up worse than Lara.

                Kirkland is glass as we all know. He would be dangerous early but Kell lands one right hand and James is hitting the deck.

                For the record I didn't score one of these fights as a Canelo win.

                But Trout/Brook...Trout doesn't have the legs or power to compete.. UD Brook

                Cotto/Brook....Damn, Great Fight. Cotto's body work against Kell's precise right hands and jabs. Two of my favorites. Damn 50/50

                Lara/Brook .....BAD STYLE MATCH UP.... Brook would be chasing a win and would need to eck out a stoppage ala Leonard/Hearns 1...Not sure he can as it's not his natural style
                u just said that cotto vs brook at 154 is 50/50


                kill yourself..............

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
                  you must know something that the ring magazine didnt, when they had him number 1 ranked welterweight.
                  Who has better wins Kell, Manny, Bradley, Thurman or Garcia? Kell is a joke.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by PivotandRoll View Post
                    Would Brook beat Angulo? Seriously is that even a question? Brook right hand busts his face up worse than Lara.

                    Kirkland is glass as we all know. He would be dangerous early but Kell lands one right hand and James is hitting the deck.

                    For the record I didn't score one of these fights as a Canelo win.

                    But Trout/Brook...Trout doesn't have the legs or power to compete.. UD Brook

                    Cotto/Brook....Damn, Great Fight. Cotto's body work against Kell's precise right hands and jabs. Two of my favorites. Damn 50/50

                    Lara/Brook .....BAD STYLE MATCH UP.... Brook would be chasing a win and would need to eck out a stoppage ala Leonard/Hearns 1...Not sure he can as it's not his natural style
                    Wow Kell is the greatest hypothetical fighter ever. Too bad he has 1 good win.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Canelo is far too flat footed, he could KO brook if he landed a big shot but i think Brook would Win on points @ 154.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP