Comments Thread For: WBA Declines To Sanction Golovkin-Brook Middleweight Bout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eff Pandas
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 52129
    • 3,624
    • 2,147
    • 1,635,919

    #111
    Originally posted by Eastcoast
    Bernard Hopkins counted his NC vs Robert Allen as one of his 20 title defenses.
    Are NC's not supposed to count towards title defenses? I'd count it just cuz the fight took place, it just happened to have a no contest result which I see more like a draw than I see like the fight didn't count or didn't happen. But I guess I see the argument towards not counting it.

    Comment

    • Eastcoast
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2014
      • 8639
      • 288
      • 0
      • 15,501

      #112
      Originally posted by Eff Pandas
      Are NC's not supposed to count towards title defenses? I'd count it just cuz the fight took place, it just happened to have a no contest result which I see more like a draw than I see like the fight didn't count or didn't happen. But I guess I see the argument towards not counting it.
      That was Nard's argument. But the other side of it is that with a NC, you can't lose the title either.

      Comment

      • kafkod
        I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 24817
        • 2,192
        • 1,809
        • 405,373

        #113
        Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
        I don't see many people agreeing with you, do you?
        I don't see many people disagreeing with me either, except 3 ******s.

        Comment

        • Godsfly
          mental hospital toughness
          • Aug 2012
          • 4950
          • 384
          • 68
          • 22,498

          #114
          Originally posted by kafkod
          As far as the WBA title goes, GGG is having a non-title fight. But he is still the WBA champion and his title run will continue after he fights Brook.

          If you don't believe me and are too stoopid to figure it out for yourself, just wait and see.
          his title defenses can continue but not his title run........A title run is consecutively defending the belt.

          also another thing is if brook wins he won't even be able to win the belt. the streak is finished because of this ridiculous fight.

          Comment

          • Eff Pandas
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 52129
            • 3,624
            • 2,147
            • 1,635,919

            #115
            Originally posted by therealpugilist
            regardless of what belts he has, he still is not the middleweight champion


            he still hasn't beaten the
            #2-4 fighters, not even one of them

            whats so significant about defending titles that you never won in the ring in the first place....the whole title reign is one of the worst in recent history

            Who else is a unified champion with 3 belts and only fought for 1?
            You can criticize GGG for the guys he hasn't fought, but you can criticize the guys who won't fight GGG more is the funny part of your, & many peoples, stance.

            I understand your stance, but as a guy who's more impartial about GGG than most of the GGG fanboys & GGG haters around these parts these days I think its underplayed how GGG's current resume has more to do with who won't fight him than who he's willing to fight.

            Comment

            • Jewish-Reptile
              COLD HEARTBREAKER
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 10708
              • 922
              • 1,095
              • 15,382

              #116
              Originally posted by kafkod
              Angst? This shit is the best laugh I've had all week!

              GGG's next defence of the WBA title will not follow on consecutively from the one before, because his fight with Brook isn't for the WBA title.

              Bwahahaha!
              Angst yeh, I could feel your fire burning, it turned me on.

              Originally posted by kafkod
              This is so funny. If I ever had any doubts that the GGG hate trolls are the dumbest people on the boxing scene, this thread ends them!
              Marco Huck moved up a weight and challenged Povetkin, he was allowed dispensation to keep the belts as obviously he would not be defending them. Golovkin has defended x amount of times and is still at said weight class, it's a break in a consecutive run.

              Deal with it, who cares.

              Comment

              • Can'tHoldMeBack
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jan 2016
                • 748
                • 42
                • 1
                • 7,021

                #117
                Originally posted by Eastcoast
                Bernard Hopkins counted his NC vs Robert Allen as one of his 20 title defenses.
                Maybe because title was defended against him before becoming a NC

                Comment

                • Jewish-Reptile
                  COLD HEARTBREAKER
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 10708
                  • 922
                  • 1,095
                  • 15,382

                  #118
                  Originally posted by kafkod
                  I don't see many people disagreeing with me either, except 3 ******s.
                  I think they're just enjoying you making a fool of yourself as usual.

                  Comment

                  • Jewish-Reptile
                    COLD HEARTBREAKER
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 10708
                    • 922
                    • 1,095
                    • 15,382

                    #119
                    Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                    Are NC's not supposed to count towards title defenses? I'd count it just cuz the fight took place, it just happened to have a no contest result which I see more like a draw than I see like the fight didn't count or didn't happen. But I guess I see the argument towards not counting it.
                    That's an interesting one, I wouldn't consider an unsuccessful defence as a defence which lets be honest NC are usually overturned because of losses against proven cheats.

                    Comment

                    • Eff Pandas
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 52129
                      • 3,624
                      • 2,147
                      • 1,635,919

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Eastcoast
                      That was Nard's argument. But the other side of it is that with a NC, you can't lose the title either.
                      Yea but thats after the fact. Going into the fight Allen could have won the title. So its not like some of those No Decision fights back in the day where the fighters went in knowing no decision would be announced.

                      The title was on the line & something happened to prevent the fight from moving forward. So I kinda see it as some sort of hybrid draw kinda outcome where neither guy gets a W or L without it being a official D. And I mean a lot of times fights that do end in a NC could have ended in a Technical Draw if enough rounds had taken place.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP