Originally posted by Eastcoast
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBA Declines To Sanction Golovkin-Brook Middleweight Bout
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostAre NC's not supposed to count towards title defenses? I'd count it just cuz the fight took place, it just happened to have a no contest result which I see more like a draw than I see like the fight didn't count or didn't happen. But I guess I see the argument towards not counting it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostAs far as the WBA title goes, GGG is having a non-title fight. But he is still the WBA champion and his title run will continue after he fights Brook.
If you don't believe me and are too stoopid to figure it out for yourself, just wait and see.
also another thing is if brook wins he won't even be able to win the belt. the streak is finished because of this ridiculous fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Postregardless of what belts he has, he still is not the middleweight champion
he still hasn't beaten the
#2-4 fighters, not even one of them
whats so significant about defending titles that you never won in the ring in the first place....the whole title reign is one of the worst in recent history
Who else is a unified champion with 3 belts and only fought for 1?
I understand your stance, but as a guy who's more impartial about GGG than most of the GGG fanboys & GGG haters around these parts these days I think its underplayed how GGG's current resume has more to do with who won't fight him than who he's willing to fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostAngst? This shit is the best laugh I've had all week!
GGG's next defence of the WBA title will not follow on consecutively from the one before, because his fight with Brook isn't for the WBA title.
Bwahahaha!
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThis is so funny. If I ever had any doubts that the GGG hate trolls are the dumbest people on the boxing scene, this thread ends them!
Deal with it, who cares.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostAre NC's not supposed to count towards title defenses? I'd count it just cuz the fight took place, it just happened to have a no contest result which I see more like a draw than I see like the fight didn't count or didn't happen. But I guess I see the argument towards not counting it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eastcoast View PostThat was Nard's argument. But the other side of it is that with a NC, you can't lose the title either.
The title was on the line & something happened to prevent the fight from moving forward. So I kinda see it as some sort of hybrid draw kinda outcome where neither guy gets a W or L without it being a official D. And I mean a lot of times fights that do end in a NC could have ended in a Technical Draw if enough rounds had taken place.
Comment
Comment