Comments Thread For: WBA Declines To Sanction Golovkin-Brook Middleweight Bout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dean_Razorback
    God of Thunder and R n' R
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2013
    • 16557
    • 1,023
    • 395
    • 98,048

    #51
    good, this is a terrible mismatch. still the WBA should've ordered GGG-Jacobs before, not after this was signed

    Comment

    • CaneloMaidana
      Banned
      • Apr 2013
      • 4430
      • 145
      • 1
      • 4,915

      #52
      Originally posted by Shadoww702
      Damn??? Who was he suppose to fight from the WBA???

      Jacobs didn't want it
      Eubank either!

      Alfonso Blanco??? With only TWELVE fights???

      How the HELL is he RANKED #1???

      The WORST Belts.

      #1 IBF
      #2 WBA
      Ward you coward

      Comment

      • kafkod
        I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 24817
        • 2,192
        • 1,809
        • 405,373

        #53
        Originally posted by _Maxi
        He's not ruining the streak you assh0le. This fight just wouldn't sum, that's it. If he moved up to 168, it's the same situation.
        Originally posted by Can'tHoldMeBack
        The streak is for consecutive defenses...
        Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
        consecutive
        kənˈsɛkjʊtɪv/
        adjective
        adjective: consecutive

        1.
        following each other continuously.
        Originally posted by bigdunny1
        You are EMBARRASSING yourself! It's a consecutive defense streak. He will be defending NO TITLE his next fight. You will do anything Maxi pad to defend this coward and his lame choices of opponents. Now you arguing what the word consecutive really means? LOG OFF and go Kill yourself
        LMFAO at these muppets!

        GGG's next defence of the WBA title will follow on consecutively from the one before.

        WBA not sanctioning this fight will make no difference to that! Golovkin's next defence of the WBA title will be his next consecutive defence

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #54
          Originally posted by kafkod
          GGG isn't being stripped of the WBA title, fool. He can carry on defending it after fighting Brook.
          Look up the definition of consecutive, i've already posted it twice in this thread.

          Comment

          • Can'tHoldMeBack
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jan 2016
            • 748
            • 42
            • 1
            • 7,021

            #55
            Originally posted by kafkod
            LMFAO at these muppets!

            GGG's next defence of the WBA title will follow on consecutively from the one before.

            WBA not sanctioning this fight will make no difference to that! Golovkin's next defence of the WBA title will be his next consecutive defence
            The belt with most defenses he had will not be getting defended, the belt wasn't sanctioned to be defended consecutively.. Are you really this slow or drunk off kool aid? The defenses have to happen back to back to back etc to continue the consecutive streak my god some of y'all really slow or maybe consecutive means something else in the lil g language

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #56
              Originally posted by kafkod
              LMFAO at these muppets!

              GGG's next defence of the WBA title will follow on consecutively from the one before.

              WBA not sanctioning this fight will make no difference to that! Golovkin's next defence of the WBA title will be his next consecutive defence
              What he just has a break in his consecutive defences?

              Comment

              • Nay_Sayer
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2011
                • 3837
                • 182
                • 1
                • 49,922

                #57
                Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
                This ends his title run.
                Yep. The Brook fight will not count as a defense of his WBA title.

                Comment

                • SilverMiles
                  It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2014
                  • 4433
                  • 482
                  • 102
                  • 35,552

                  #58
                  Originally posted by kafkod
                  LMFAO at these muppets!

                  GGG's next defence of the WBA title will follow on consecutively from the one before.

                  WBA not sanctioning this fight will make no difference to that! Golovkin's next defence of the WBA title will be his next consecutive defence
                  Their hate for GGG has them trying to find loopholes to end GGG's title streak. The steak continues in his next fight for the WBA title. But his KO streak in championship fight extends if he KOs Brook.

                  I wonder if GGG can break his own record.

                  Comment

                  • 1hourRun
                    SQUAD-UP!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 20526
                    • 2,789
                    • 2,336
                    • 140,312

                    #59


                    OH! LOL! the WBA dont even want that chump change!!!! hahahaha! But the WBO is going to get a cut of dat Nelo paper you feel me? we do it BIG! they lite!

                    Comment

                    • _Maxi
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 8978
                      • 509
                      • 718
                      • 91,740

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
                      What he just has a break in his consecutive defences?
                      The concept was coined to differentiate of those who have lost the belt in the middle from those who haven't... and you know it pretty well.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP