Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
1. Nope, it was just a general question about IVs and dehydration.
a) No they commented on whether an IV can be used for hydration. We both know the answer to that by now.
Yes you can but there is a criteria that needs to be met.
"However, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code."
b) Also, how can this person know about the details about this specific case when the process declares that its all confidential and independent ..... and there is no mention of who is being reviewed?
2.
a) WADA review is optional.
b) If they would be reviewing, what they look for is if the procedures (WADA standards and protocol) were followed. They would not be looking very deep unless it was obviously badly written up application.
c) If they did review/investigate the case, we would more than likely hear about it just like any other high profile case.
3. Floyd's Dr Alex Ariza said that IV was a must due to Floyd's medical condition. Floyd requested the RETRO TUE almost 3 weeks after the fact. USADA approved it soon after (next day). USADA just rubber stamped it without really following thru with finding out if what was stated in the application was truthful.
WADA would not be able to find anything if the application was written up properly.
4. I responded to this on point 1.
No, giving urine, giving <1 tablespoon of blood 10 days before the IV, exercising a little bit is NOT a good reason to get an IV.
Actually, the above points were brought up by Floyd, Floyd fans and USADA for 5+ years. For 5+ years, the above was not acceptable reason for Manny but now its acceptable reason for Floyd???? .....

Also, if that is an acceptable criteria, then not only Floyd but every athlete can do the same and get an IV but we both know that only FLoyd can get that kind of exception.
Case reopened!

Comment