Seriously though.... Why won't GGG fight Lara?

[kafkod]

What a spastic, Lara is a step up from anyone on Golovkin's resume that's why people want to see the fight.

Nobody but you and your 10 alts want to see Lara fight ANYBODY ...

[Jewish-Reptile]

What competitive fights are you craving for Hearn to put on? Golovkin vs Eubank Jnr?

.... oh, wait ...

Ain't nobody south of 168 standing up to GGG. I'd be happy with DeGale or Smith vs GGG. Brook versus Spence or Vargas would have satisfied, I guess they can dodge Spence after citing they can't make 147 again or build GGG up to the UK audience for those 168 fights mentioned, after GGG destroys their perceived elite boxer I'd have thought Golovkin will be looked on as some other worldly entity. Strange mentality upon those shores.

[Robbie Barrett]

Nobody but you and your 10 alts want to see Lara fight ANYBODY ...

Look at the poll results they're all regular posters not alts that voted.

When's the steroid cheat in your avi going to come out of hiding. Nobody takes that clown serious either.

[Motofan]

A smaller man, with multiple loses who has stunk up all of his step up fights? Yeah. Why not waste one of a 34 year olds remaining prime fights against that guy. Oh and does he put asses in the seats? No? Oh even better.

[Robbie Barrett]

A smaller man, with multiple loses who has stunk up all of his step up fights? Yeah. Why not waste one of a 34 year olds remaining prime fights against that guy. Oh and does he put asses in the seats? No? Oh even better.

Fighting the most skilled fighter you will have ever fought is a waste of a fight? Fighting guys like Wade and Welterweights isn't?

[Graz]

A smaller man, with multiple loses who has stunk up all of his step up fights? Yeah. Why not waste one of a 34 year olds remaining prime fights against that guy. Oh and does he put asses in the seats? No? Oh even better.

I think that's exactly the point. Lara is really irrelevant. He's a good fighter but puts no skin in the game to warrant a fight with GGG. It would be a waste of his time to pound Lara. Lara should feel relieved seriously.

[kafkod]

Ain't nobody south of 168 standing up to GGG. I'd be happy with DeGale or Smith vs GGG. Brook versus Spence or Vargas would have satisfied, I guess they can dodge Spence after citing they can't make 147 again or build GGG up to the UK audience for those 168 fights mentioned, after GGG destroys their perceived elite boxer I'd have thought Golovkin will be looked on as some other worldly entity. Strange mentality upon those shores.

Strange mentality? Yeah, we Brits are wise to you and your shape-changing reptile cohorts after what you tried to do to Tyson Fury.

GGG recently won a Sky Sports poll for best P4P boxer in the world, and super-human other-worldly entity is the logical next step up from that. Whatever, if he beats Kell Brook, that should open the door to other big fights for him over here.

[Motofan]

Fighting the most skilled fighter you will have ever fought is a waste of a fight? Fighting guys like Wade and Welterweights isn't?

Wade was also a garbage fight. I'm just stating facts about Lara. Lara's best win is Trout. **** out of here with that most skilled fighter ****. TROUT.

[Robbie Barrett]

Yeah, we Brits are wise to you and your shape-changing reptile cohorts after what you tried to do to Tyson Fury.

GGG recently won a Sky Sports poll for best P4P boxer in the world, and super human other worldly entity is the logical next step up from that. Whatever, if he beats Kell Brook, that should open the door to other big fights for him over here.

Lies again. It was a list where you voted if a boxer should be in the P4P top 10, you could vote for all fighters, nowhere could you vote for who is the best P4P fighter in the world. Constant lies comes out of your mouth.

[_Maxi]

What a ****** thread.

Lara's team has already stated that they want big money.
Also said that GGG has to fight on showtime, etc.

It's Lara who is just using GGG's name for marketing reasons.