Take away GGG's titles and what do you have?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Problem Child
    Machines break, I don't.
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2013
    • 16960
    • 1,008
    • 480
    • 67,053

    #51
    [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/aRyxQ59LfSKOc/*****.gif[/IMG]

    Comment

    • Jewish-Reptile
      COLD HEARTBREAKER
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 10708
      • 922
      • 1,095
      • 15,382

      #52
      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
      He is certainly a cut above the guys at 160, but it comes down to what that really means.

      Guys with better names on their dossier have taken just as much or more **** than Golovkin. It is not really debatable that he is the top dog at 160 though, what is debatable is what that accomplishment really means in the grand scheme of boxing.
      Fantastic post. GGG has taken too many step aside fees whilst gotten too old, his chase the green conquest has detracted from his resume.

      Comment

      • Pigeons
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2013
        • 14750
        • 1,211
        • 714
        • 37,430

        #53
        Take away GGG's titles and what do you have?
        A coward...

        Comment

        • boliodogs
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 33358
          • 824
          • 1,782
          • 309,589

          #54
          I think GGG is the best middleweight in the world and Spence is the best welterweight in the world. Very few middleweights are willing to fight GGG and very few welterweights are willing to fight Spence. GGG is 34 years old so he might be a bit past his prime. Spence is 26 and just entering his prime.

          Comment

          • Chuckguy
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 13927
            • 345
            • 183
            • 58,389

            #55
            Originally posted by therealpugilist
            You'' have exactly what he is with the trinkets.....the # 1 contender in a division, devoid of a undisputed champion


            the belts mean nothing....hell he only fought for one of them...one was handed to him and the other he had a minor belt and got elevated the super champion status without a fight....not exactly ground breaking
            Belts only mean something when it comes to Floyd and you mention that he only won one of 3 but fail to state why
            Agendas??

            Comment

            • PeasantCrusha
              120-0 w/ 117KOs
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 3690
              • 254
              • 356
              • 19,461

              #56
              Originally posted by Boxfan83
              Kazachs version of Errol Spence... Am I right or wrong?? Thoughts???
              Take away GGG's titles and you still have, Canelo's father.

              Comment

              • Sugar Adam Ali
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2013
                • 27630
                • 970
                • 1,174
                • 82,827

                #57
                Without titles, Golovkin is still a knockout machine who is most deserving for a big fight

                Comment

                • Elroy The Great
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2016
                  • 15935
                  • 371
                  • 249
                  • 45,972

                  #58
                  taking away doesnt add up.

                  Comment

                  • Luilun
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 12457
                    • 555
                    • 94
                    • 58,436

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Boxfan83
                    Kazachs version of Errol Spence... Am I right or wrong?? Thoughts???
                    I think you better make a different thread it's a ****** question he earned those titles. Would you like it if someone said your no Marine even though you enlisted and finish the training ? If he's no Champ than your no Marine

                    Comment

                    • Eff Pandas
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 52129
                      • 3,624
                      • 2,147
                      • 1,635,919

                      #60
                      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                      It is not really debatable that he is the top dog at 160 though, what is debatable is what that accomplishment really means in the grand scheme of boxing.
                      Thats fair, but I always feel like all anyone can be is the best during their time & I feel like GGG has done that if only by way of Canelo running from their fight.

                      I do feel like there is a unique, rarer situation going on with GGG in that he's the best guy that the other top guys won't get paid enough to fight (or they just "scared doe" as many fans are quick to claim) thus impacting everyone's status at 160 & not allowing for GGG to show how good he is or isn't. I mean I can't think of a guy who's had more fights vs other names or top guys fall through or denied by the other side than GGG since I've been watching boxing. So you kinda gotta believe either K2 is ****ty at boxing business or GGG is the baddest mofo lowdown in this town.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP