the term BORING means "wins fights clearly/hard to beat" on NSB

[therealpugilist]

I just don't understand how people can be this dumb though??

I refuse to believe Canelomaidana, paulienuts, therealpugillist, larryxxx are more than one person.

i refuse to think you have common sense. No one has time to be on this forum 24/7 with all those alts

[therealpugilist]

if there was boxing evening consisting of the last fight of each of the guys mentioned, i fail to believe any person in the world could stay awake

Pep and whitaker are 2 of my all time favs....diff folks, diff strokes

[Madison Boxing]

Winning is boring. Like Larry Merchant said "There's no room for perfection in boxing."

no it isnt, when thurman won against porter it wsant boring. when frampton won against santa cruz it wasnt boring. when someone wins by refusing to engage, clinching, fouling, spoiling, that IS boring

[therealpugilist]

It's just an easy excuse now

A fighter loses just say you lost because the other guy ran, You don't want to figt someone say he's boring

It's sad that people actually listen to it

Clearly Defense isn't as exciting or sexy as offence but a great D will usually beat a great Offense

In no other sport does Defense get sh.it on like it does boxing. Can you imagine the NFL being like no one wants to watch the Seahawks because their boring or Baseball pumping the narrative of Don't come to the Dodgers game because Kershaws going to shut it down tonight you don't want to see that . No they embrace it and try to promote it

yea, it is kinda weird...other sports dont criticize you for being great on defense.

[j0zef]

I can understand that, but its no coincidence that the fighters are usually of the dominant, undefeated calibre fighters.


seems more like "wanting" to see a competitive fight or wanting a certain guy to lose to me

Not at all. Wlad was defeated and is boring. Orlando Salido was defeated but is not boring. Pac was defeated and is not boring. Eleidar Alvarez is undefeated, highly ranked, but is boring as hell to watch.

I think the better argument would be that there is a certain skillset that makes the fight boring, and that skillset is often practiced by men and women who are good boxers. So you combine someone who's a great boxer and masters a defensive skillset, and you end up with a boring, difficult to defeat fighter.

Trying to make this about any specific fighter or race is ******. There are boring white guys and exciting african american fighters. Hell, the poster boy for 'boring', Floyd, was a pretty exciting fighter to watch in his early years - when he still carried power.

[therealpugilist]

Of course you wouldn't understand, you only watch boxing to "learn" lol hipster douche

i like all types of fights....i just dont make lame excuses when fighters I like take a Loss.....he boring doe, he ran doe, he landing punches...oops

[-PBP-]

no it isnt, when thurman won against porter it wsant boring. when frampton won against santa cruz it wasnt boring. when someone wins by refusing to engage, clinching, fouling, spoiling, that IS boring

Because they were evenly matched

[Beercules]

I hate GGG

[Madison Boxing]

I just don't understand how people can be this dumb though??

I refuse to believe Canelomaidana, paulienuts, therealpugillist, larryxxx are more than one person.

canelomaidana and pauliewalnuts are the same person for sure, or if they arent then they are twins who were seperated at birth

[Madison Boxing]

Pep and whitaker are 2 of my all time favs....diff folks, diff strokes

them 2 arent as boring as people like ward and wlad, didnt clinch every 2 seconds