Comments Thread For: Froch To Golovkin: Pick on Someone Your Own Size or Move Up!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GGG Gloveking
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2016
    • 12382
    • 658
    • 193
    • 189,439

    #221
    Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts
    They have Tyson at 5'10.




    Does that look like a 1 inch difference to you?
    In the one pic, Hagler looks about 5'5 1/2" since Tyson is 5'10". Is Hagler the same height as Pac?

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #222
      Originally posted by GGG Gloveking
      In the one pic, Hagler looks about 5'5 1/2" since Tyson is 5'10". Is Hagler the same height as Pac?
      If i was to guess i'd say Hagler was around 5'7 and Tyson 5'11 and half

      Comment

      • GGG Gloveking
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2016
        • 12382
        • 658
        • 193
        • 189,439

        #223
        Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts
        If i was to guess i'd say Hagler was around 5'7 and Tyson 5'11 and half
        Who's the third guy in the one pic? He can be used for reference since the heights of Tyson and Hagler are in question. The pic of just Tyson and Hagler looks like they are pretty close in height. Notice how Tyson arm has to raise up to get on Marvins shoulder. The pic of them two doesn't look like a 4.5 inch difference to me.

        Myself, I am going to trust 4 separate sources and say Marvin is between 5-9 and 5-10

        Comment

        • Metho_4u
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2013
          • 7357
          • 211
          • 467
          • 18,920

          #224
          Originally posted by chris232
          no cause people keep running from him.
          Lol, yes that again. We know, not a single guy ...oh except a WW will fight him.

          Actually, I recall Timothy bradleysaid he would fight him, so that's 2 WW's actually.

          Comment

          • Metho_4u
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 7357
            • 211
            • 467
            • 18,920

            #225
            Originally posted by chris232
            better lighting in the left picture
            Dude really, just stop with that **** already. He was f'n RIPPED in the left pic...it could be pitch black and you could see it. I admire your attempt at defending your hero, but this is a little much.

            Comment

            • Metho_4u
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2013
              • 7357
              • 211
              • 467
              • 18,920

              #226
              Originally posted by BillyBoxing
              Brook will lose some fat and gain some musle, he won't be 176 in the ring, probably be 165 ripped wich is OK for a 160 fight.

              He will definitely be in decent shape for this fight, Brook is built like a 154 pounder.

              The main problem for Brook is he's not used to be stalked by a MW, let alone a pretty much heavy handed one.

              Brook is used to WW lightening speed, and it will help him.

              Doing well versus a MW is possible for a WW, Duran and Leonard did well vs Hagler and didn't get stopped.

              You're very negative about this fight wich is OK but what is your prediction?

              You're picking GGG by easy KO?
              I think pretty much everyone is

              Comment

              • IrishGolovkin
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Feb 2016
                • 157
                • 7
                • 5
                • 6,595

                #227
                Froch is a ****ing idiot. Has this warrior image yet ducked so many fighters. Also probably the worst pundit in the history of boxing.

                Comment

                • Metho_4u
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 7357
                  • 211
                  • 467
                  • 18,920

                  #228
                  Originally posted by New England
                  froch is both jealous and afraid. the only thing froch does better than golovkin is sell tickets. golovkin would have had every answer. carl froch had trouble with jermain f#cking taylor. i was at that fight.

                  timing beats speed. it beats "slow," too


                  froch had a great career, but he should shut that big mouth of his unless he's willing to come out of retirement and take a beating.
                  Yeah, that 37 year old, who's been inactive for how long? On top of that, he's already proven himself...golovkin is fighting a blown up WW in comparison. Stfu and stop being an idiot.

                  Comment

                  • Metho_4u
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 7357
                    • 211
                    • 467
                    • 18,920

                    #229
                    Originally posted by IrishGolovkin
                    Froch is a ****ing idiot. Has this warrior image yet ducked so many fighters. Also probably the worst pundit in the history of boxing.
                    Oh, a new alt GayLoveKin supporter...hi Pete, meet repeat

                    Comment

                    • SteveM
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 8331
                      • 2,314
                      • 1,217
                      • 35,733

                      #230
                      Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts
                      You get your heights from boxrec? They have Murray down as 6' (183cm), he looks the same height as Golovkin in every pic i've seen of them together.





                      I'd rather go by stats than photos. Photos can be deceptive - those ones are taken from a slight angle with Golovkin closer to the camera - that could account for a 1.5 inch difference looking the same.

                      Here's one for you


                      Should we just ignore all BoxRec stats and bow to Walnut truth?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP