Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would you rather be a boring winner or an exciting loser?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
    Yeah but Mayweather, Leonard, and Lewis are ranked higher than those guys all time even though they weren't as excit.ing


    only Floyd from your list is boring

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
      only Floyd from your list is boring
      Obviously you never watched much of Lewis's or Leonard's fights. You're clearly one of those guys who probably saw a few fights and a highlight reel. Both Leonard and Lewis had their fair share of boring fights.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Beercules View Post
        that was good


        Have to love crazy ass Junior
        Definitely an underrated character

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
          Name a boring fighter that isn't one of the most skilled in the sport? I've asked you this before and you had no answer.
          And this is why boxing is dying. But then we got deluded morons saying fans want boring fighters.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
            Obviously you never watched much of Lewis's or Leonard's fights. You're clearly one of those guys who probably saw a few fights and a highlight reel. Both Leonard and Lewis had their fair share of boring fights.


            i probably have boxing tapes older than you...sit your ass down, son

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by larryxxx.... View Post
              Would you rather be called boring, take less punishment and win

              Or be called exciting, take tons of punishment and lose??
              You ask the wrong question. We're boxing fans not boxers. You need to ask what we would rather watch a boring fighter that wins or an exciting fighter that loses some time? I would much rather watch the exciting fighter.

              Comment


              • #87
                so much fake in this thread.

                if these bruvvas really appreciate fighters who are slick movers then Crawford would've sold more ppvs...he didn't because them slick fans didn't buy his fight.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
                  i probably have boxing tapes older than you...sit your ass down, son
                  You're probably one of those guys who started watching boxing around the time Pacquiao's career started blowing up... sit down son.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by madsweeney View Post
                    This guy cracks me up, cant even get common expression right...btw its "Different strokes for different folks"

                    And exciting fighters are not omitted from having skills. Guys like Morales, JMM, Hagler, Tyson, Hearns, Duran, and Toney were hardly skill-less brawlers yet they were extremely exciting fighters.

                    That's the problem with you Floyd stans, you think skill and excitement are mutually exclusive. The irony is, by reacting the way you do, you just acknowledge that Floyd is boring.
                    Post of the day!

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                      You're probably one of those guys who started watching boxing around the time Pacquiao's career started blowing up... sit down son.


                      try 1980...a lot longer than the first episode of 24/7 when you first started to follow boxing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP