Would you rather be a boring winner or an exciting loser?

[KillaCamNZ]

Boring winner.

Because who gives a **** what people think - this is competition, and competition is about winning.

[Spoon23]

[B]for the record, those of you who voted exciting loser have some issues


when was it cool to take a loss? you guys got an inferiority complex and are born losers. Have you guys ever played sports?

you can have the arturo Gatti types......I'll keep looking up to the prime Roy jONES' AND WHITAKERS who made it look easy and WON.

lol Larry was able to create a tricky question that I didnt get fooled into voting. I can't believe Larry has that mental capacity to make a tricky question lol

Yup as others have said, there should be an option for exciting winner. That's my Pick.

[True-Boxing-Fan]

Would you rather be called boring, take less punishment and win

Or be called exciting, take tons of punishment and lose??

***ing Larry. I get a total kick out of your threads even though they are dumb as ****.

You are one strange guy.

[boxinghead530]

Would you rather be called boring, take less punishment and win

Or be called exciting, take tons of punishment and lose??

Typical Larry thread. What the f$ck is going on in your head?

Did the doctor drop you on your head when you were a baby?

[The Gambler1981]

Winning is winning there is no substitute~

or

Winning isn't everything, it is the only thing~

[Rath]

Yeah but Mayweather, Leonard, and Lewis are ranked higher than those guys all time even though they weren't as excit.ing

lenoard, lewis boring?

here goes mr. genius again

[tangalog2200]

Would you rather be called boring, take less punishment and win

Or be called exciting, take tons of punishment and lose??

would i rather be a boring winner?

would i rather be a boring fighter? should be the first question....

and how did the boring fighter win? is the second question...

on the other hand;

would i rather be an exciting loser?

would i rather be an exciting fighter? yes, of course!

would i rather win exciting fights? yes, of course!

would i rather lose exciting fights? of course not!

would i accept losing in exciting fights? only if the other guy was really better...in the ring....not just on paper....

[Rath]

a boring fighter vs a boring fighter

sure there will be a boring fighter winning in this fight

an exciting fighter vs an exciting fighter

sure there will be an exciting fighter losing in this fight

now what larry did was fit the boring fighter vs the exciting loser

genius floyd fan and his logic

[Larry the boss]

amazing how many people would rather take punishment and be a loser then avoid it and win..how does that even make sense?

[boxinghead530]

amazing how many people would rather take punishment and be a loser then avoid it and win..how does that even make sense?

Well it makes sense monetarily. This is called prize fighting meaning you are doing it to get the biggest pay. The exciting fighters 9 times out of 10 make more money over the boring fighter. So when you look at it that way it's smarter to be the exciting fighter.

Look at Maidana. Dude was an exciting fighter, he took losses. But the guy is a popular fighter and became a multi millionaire.