Obviously you never watched much of Lewis's or Leonard's fights. You're clearly one of those guys who probably saw a few fights and a highlight reel. Both Leonard and Lewis had their fair share of boring fights.
Obviously you never watched much of Lewis's or Leonard's fights. You're clearly one of those guys who probably saw a few fights and a highlight reel. Both Leonard and Lewis had their fair share of boring fights.
i probably have boxing tapes older than you...sit your ass down, son
Would you rather be called boring, take less punishment and win
Or be called exciting, take tons of punishment and lose??
You ask the wrong question. We're boxing fans not boxers. You need to ask what we would rather watch a boring fighter that wins or an exciting fighter that loses some time? I would much rather watch the exciting fighter.
if these bruvvas really appreciate fighters who are slick movers then Crawford would've sold more ppvs...he didn't because them slick fans didn't buy his fight.
This guy cracks me up, cant even get common expression right...btw its "Different strokes for different folks"
And exciting fighters are not omitted from having skills. Guys like Morales, JMM, Hagler, Tyson, Hearns, Duran, and Toney were hardly skill-less brawlers yet they were extremely exciting fighters.
That's the problem with you Floyd stans, you think skill and excitement are mutually exclusive. The irony is, by reacting the way you do, you just acknowledge that Floyd is boring.
Tweet
that was good
Comment