Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would you rather be a boring winner or an exciting loser?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by El-blanco View PostObviously you want to be the boring winner. But is that good for the consumer who is the sole reason fighters make a living? No.
This is a really ****** question and I have no idea why a consumer of the sport would outright root for a boring fighter. You have no stake in his career. You're mentally ill, Larry.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chris232 View Postno they dont, they call a boring fighter boring. its not to do with skill, lomas got to be one of the most skillful going with his footwork etc and casual fans in awe of him from what ive seen. People dont like negative boring fighters. Why do you find this so hard to understand??
Comment
-
Originally posted by El-blanco View PostObviously you want to be the boring winner. But is that good for the consumer who is the sole reason fighters make a living? No.
This is a really ****** question and I have no idea why a consumer of the sport would outright root for a boring fighter. You have no stake in his career. You're mentally ill, Larry.
/end thread.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View PostA consumer wants the best they can get, if that means it turns out boring so be it, the other guy wasn't good enough to make it competitive.
its about winning at the end of the day. When I ran track and wrestled in high school i didnt GAF if the crowd was entertained, its about winning.
Comment
-
^ this is the difference between boxing fans and the new generation of boxing hipsters.
they think they are the ones that are actually fighting, it's so sad.
' its about the W doe'
Massively concerned with how much ' their ' fighter is getting paid, like they are actually part of their entourage.
who gives a *** about purses, PPV views, 'the W'. show me a good ****ing fight and stfu you complete bunch of benders.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El-blanco View PostObviously you want to be the boring winner. But is that good for the consumer who is the sole reason fighters make a living? No.
This is a really ****** question and I have no idea why a consumer of the sport would outright root for a boring fighter. You have no stake in his career. You're mentally ill, Larry.
excitement and being entertained is in the eye of the beholder but winning is winning and losing is still losing.
kinda ****** to trash a fighter because his opponents cant adjust to their style...thats the opponents fault and the opposing trainers fault
I root for winners, not strugglers who end up brain dead by 28...boxing isnt played, you fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by mlac View Post^ this is the difference between boxing fans and the new generation of boxing hipsters.
they think they are the ones that are actually fighting, it's so sad.
' its about the W doe'
Massively concerned with how much ' their ' fighter is getting paid, like they are actually part of their entourage.
who gives a *** about purses, PPV views, 'the W'. show me a good ****ing fight and stfu you complete bunch of benders.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El-blanco View PostObviously you want to be the boring winner. But is that good for the consumer who is the sole reason fighters make a living? No.
This is a really ****** question and I have no idea why a consumer of the sport would outright root for a boring fighter. You have no stake in his career. You're mentally ill, Larry.
for all the pro business guys in here, they forget this is an entertainment business and if there is no entertainment how do we call it? BORING!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View PostName a boring fighter that isn't one of the most skilled in the sport? I've asked you this before and you had no answer.
Comment
Comment