Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hopkins on GGG-Brook: Time Will Reveal All The Frauds in Boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Time revealed one big fraud, and that is BHop since he allied with Mr Fishnet to protect his mexican coward.

    Bias and $$$ turned BHop into a dirty liar.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by r1onnie2 View Post
      That's not an accurate statement, future casual generations of boxing fans may not care. I'm a real boxing fan and still care and remember the Oba Carr's, Rafael Pineda's, Vince Phillips, Frankie Randall's and Kostya Tszyu's of the world. There remembered because the were good fighters that happen to be stuck in eras with great fighters such as De la Hoya, Trinidad and Ike Quartey's of the world. So that's just your opinion when it comes to future generation, because at some point we all were a future generation and I defiantly don't share that same view. And as for Glen Johnson, yeah he lost a lot of fights in his career for whatever reasons but when Hopkins beat him he was 32-0!
      32-0 looks pretty but 95% of the fighter Johnson faced had losing records and (or) at least 10 losses prior to facing Johnson.

      And unfortunately most fighters are forgotten and they're judged by the great fighter they have lost too. Future fans of the sport will be doing the exact same thing you're doing, hyping up fighters of the past resume by hyping their opposition.

      What you're saying isn't new and fans of past generation have always done it to glorify their golden era. Holmes and Joppy never showed the greatness to suggest they could walk over any MW of today and looking at the fighters they lost too even back then suggests they would lose to many of today's MW.

      Comment


      • BHop speaking purely like a business man here. If Conyellow wasn't his company's bread and butter he would be able to keep it real but since he isn't he has to lie through his teeth.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jubei View Post
          Time revealed one big fraud, and that is BHop since he allied with Mr Fishnet to protect his mexican coward.

          Bias and $$$ turned BHop into a dirty liar.
          Oscar has a resume that embarrasses those old Russians you worship.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SnakeVen0m View Post
            BHop speaking purely like a business man here. If Conyellow wasn't his company's bread and butter he would be able to keep it real but since he isn't he has to lie through his teeth.

            When did he lie ?

            The fact is, time will reveal the frauds in boxing.

            Golovkin - along with the rest of Team Bull**** - currently have the casual-fans fooled with their lies and hollow promises..... but historians will judge Golovkin by the names on his resume, not by the cringe-worthy excuses he peddles to his gullible fanbase.

            It's kinda like the lying/cheating wife scenario.

            She can make all the promises in the world on her wedding day.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by boxingitis View Post
              GGG first choice was Canelo, then Eubank Jr. Isnt Canelo better than Brook and Lara? Your logic makes no sense.
              Canelo is everybody's first choice. It doesn't mean you get to fight boxing's biggest star by cherry picking easy opposition. Grovelkin could have atleast tried to make a respectable fight against a real fighter like Lara. Instead he chose to fight a blown up WW that can't KO him and can't move around with that machete torn leg. This is an easy fight. The smoke and mirrors act continues.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
                Why would they get Lara for a fight in the UK?

                That doesn't make any sense. They had less than 2 months to finalize an opponent for the O2? arena (or whatever UK arena it was again).
                They didn't have to fight Eubank Jr to begin with. He is a flawed inexperience MW. That's who they wanted to fight next? They put themselves in that position to begin with. They didn't negotiate with the Lara camp. They tried to use the shock and awe tactics to spark a buzz for this fight. They literally did exactly what Canelo did with Khan. Out of nowhere fight a much smaller name guy and since nobody sees it coming hope somehow that gets people excited. Fail.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ComicDon View Post
                  32-0 looks pretty but 95% of the fighter Johnson faced had losing records and (or) at least 10 losses prior to facing Johnson.

                  And unfortunately most fightpers are forgotten and they're judged by the great fighter they have lost too. Future fans of the sport will be doing the exact same thing you're doing, hyping up fighters of the past resume by hyping their opposition.

                  What you're saying isn't new and fans of past generation have always done it to glorify their golden era. Holmes and Joppy never showed the greatness to suggest they could walk over any MW of today and looking at the fighters they lost too even back then suggests they would lose to many of today's MW.
                  Know matter who the fighters were that Johnson fought at the time he fought Hopkins he was undefeated. He didn't have 5 losses or 10 losses, he was undefeated. The losses in Johnson's career came after the Hopkins loss.

                  As for future fans which one is it, will they forget about those type of fighters like you stated earlier? Or are future fans of the sport going to do what I'm so called doing, which is it can't have it both ways.

                  I don't know if you've ever seen Joppy or Holmes fight but I have. What I've seen from them and todays MW, they would beat today's MW IMO. Obviously we don't see eye-to-eye, so lets just agree to disagree.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Boxing lives View Post
                    Canelo is everybody's first choice. It doesn't mean you get to fight boxing's biggest star by cherry picking easy opposition. Grovelkin could have atleast tried to make a respectable fight against a real fighter like Lara. Instead he chose to fight a blown up WW that can't KO him and can't move around with that machete torn leg. This is an easy fight. The smoke and mirrors act continues.
                    No stupid fcuk, you get to fight boxings biggest star if you become his mando. Unless that guy decides to forfeit and become boxings laughing stock.

                    He didn't choose Brook, he was offered over 2x his career high by Brooks promoter, after Eubank backed out with 2 months to Hbo date. They've contacted Haymon about Lara for the next fight. You haven't heard this? Lara's manager: " Lara commands a lot of money, this fight won't be easy to make"

                    You made 3 points, all ******ed. That takes special talent

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Boxing lives View Post
                      Canelo is everybody's first choice. It doesn't mean you get to fight boxing's biggest star by cherry picking easy opposition. Grovelkin could have atleast tried to make a respectable fight against a real fighter like Lara. Instead he chose to fight a blown up WW that can't KO him and can't move around with that machete torn leg. This is an easy fight. The smoke and mirrors act continues.
                      Who is a bigger fight Smith or GGG? Canelo is the one cherry picking, otherwise he wouldve picked the bigger fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP