dont think theres any fighter with a more boring 'style' than wladimir klitschko
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who had the more entertaining style: Butterbean or Wlad?
Collapse
-
-
Klitchkos style is more for ppl who like technical boxing ...theres a major shortage of these fans even though i voted Butterbean ,you cant compare a 4 rnd fighter to a 12 rnd one who uses patience and thinking and be more exciting ......if Wlad fought 4 rnders he would be near impossible to defeat bc stamina is thrown out the window and you would be bombarded by bombs of destruction ....ive fought in toughman contests so i have a good grasp of the frenzy involved !
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostIn case some of you aren't familiar with him, Eric "Butterbean" Esch rose up through the ranks of the Toughman circuit and kept that style during his time in the pros.
Here are some highlights:
Based on that highlight I'd say Butterbean. The 3 or 4 Klitschko fights I've seen were really boring, especially the Povetkin one.
Comment
-
-
Butterbean really didn't box, he brawled, that's why he lost to a former HW champ almost 20 years after his prime. Thread is a nonsense waste of web data.
Comment
-
Butterbean was an all action fighter who always attacked throwing heavy punches. His style was more entertaining overall. Still I would rather watch a great champion like Wlad fight than an average fighter like Butterbean. Prime Wlad had that accurate left jab that was almost as hard as most heavyweight's straight right. His straight right was so powerful it was shocking. Nobody likes his constant holding but he was still something special to see. When he fought in his prime it was almost certain his opponent would suffer a devastating KO loss usually from a monster right hand.
Comment
Comment