Who had the more entertaining style: Butterbean or Wlad?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • juggernaut666
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 15544
    • 1,226
    • 500
    • 87,472

    #41
    Originally posted by LoadedWraps

    Not really dude. I am drawn to technical fighters the most and I can't stand Wlad.

    You can be technical and boring, and you can be technical and exciting.

    Guys like Rigo, Lomachenko, Bradley, Fury, Golovkin, Roman, and Kovalev are all technical fighters who I consider exciting to watch.

    Then there are guys like Devon, Wlad, Ward, Shiming, who I just really can't get into at all, and won't tune in to watch them intentionally.

    Klitchko has some of the best technical punches ive seen,perfect straight right and great jab and top left hook . ButterBean has no technical skills thats why hes more exciting he just trains for 4 rnds . If Wlad had 4 rnd fights all his fights would probably end in k.os bc he wont pace himself., it would look like his early fights.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP