Who had the more entertaining style: Butterbean or Wlad?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShoulderRoll
    Join The Great Resist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 56403
    • 10,211
    • 5,035
    • 763,445

    #31
    Originally posted by Ray Corso
    Not sure the word "Style" has anything to do with either man.
    Bean was a freak show 4 round guy who never was a serious competitor as far as contending for a title.
    Wlad was a 1/2 stand up boxer who had a weak chin and held anyone that got close.
    Neither man will be remembered in the future as a great boxer/fighter.
    Ray
    Interesting point of view as always. Thanks for your thoughts, Ray.

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 56403
      • 10,211
      • 5,035
      • 763,445

      #32
      Originally posted by LacedUp
      Nothing is less entertaining than Wladimir Klitschko.

      And I've seen Henri Akinwande fight.
      How did I miss this gem of a post?

      Comment

      • Boxfan83
        The Coach
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 15853
        • 2,103
        • 733
        • 160,371

        #33
        Originally posted by Derranged
        I'd like to see him vs a 1980s Mr T.
        Id piti the fool who took an 80's version of Mr. T.

        Comment

        • ShoulderRoll
          Join The Great Resist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 56403
          • 10,211
          • 5,035
          • 763,445

          #34
          Mr. T was a wrestler as well as a bouncer. He could probably kick some butt in real life.

          Comment

          • ShoulderRoll
            Join The Great Resist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 56403
            • 10,211
            • 5,035
            • 763,445

            #35
            There is a difference between being historically significant and being entertaining.

            They are not always one and the same.

            Comment

            • TripleGFightFan
              Banned
              • Sep 2015
              • 1422
              • 69
              • 0
              • 1,985

              #36
              Originally posted by LacedUp
              Nothing is less entertaining than Wladimir Klitschko.

              And I've seen Henri Akinwande fight.
              What about junior witter?...he holds his guards like bill cartwright shoots...really ugly form to look at...makes me cringe and change channel everytime...

              Comment

              • ShoulderRoll
                Join The Great Resist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 56403
                • 10,211
                • 5,035
                • 763,445

                #37
                Lol @ the Bill Cartwright reference.

                Comment

                • LoadedWraps
                  Official NSB POTY 2016
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 24267
                  • 1,021
                  • 1,468
                  • 190,165

                  #38
                  Originally posted by juggernaut666
                  Klitchkos style is more for ppl who like technical boxing ...

                  Not really dude. I am drawn to technical fighters the most and I can't stand Wlad.

                  You can be technical and boring, and you can be technical and exciting.

                  Guys like Rigo, Lomachenko, Bradley, Fury, Golovkin, Roman, and Kovalev are all technical fighters who I consider exciting to watch.

                  Then there are guys like Devon, Wlad, Ward, Shiming, who I just really can't get into at all, and won't tune in to watch them intentionally.

                  Comment

                  • Robbie Barrett
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 40891
                    • 2,779
                    • 667
                    • 570,921

                    #39
                    How much better would Butterbean have been if he wasn't a fat mess? He'd have had a hell of a lot more speed, been able to throw a lot more punches and his arms would have had full range of movement.


                    But he wouldn't have had the following he had, his appeal was that he was a fat mess that could fight. It made all the fat messes of America feel like they could achieve something.

                    Comment

                    • bwilson
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Sep 2016
                      • 196
                      • 600
                      • 145
                      • 7,592

                      #40
                      More exciting, Butterbean, but he was not ever really a contender.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP