Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Berto Wouldn't Be A Gimme For Danny Garcia, Says Showtime VP

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
    Yeah I thought Garcia-Guerrero was a good fight. One of the best this year, in case you missed it. It was a good matchup. A solid, strong, experienced welter who would test Garcia's intestinal fortitude. Go figure.

    As far as how was Guerrero handed a shot at a vacant title, that's irrelevant. You blaming Garcia for that too? You're all over the place.

    I don't agree that Garcia has done "nothing" since Matthysse. Peterson was a solid opponent, Guerrero was a solid opponent, Herrera was a solid opponent. That's to go along with Matthysse and Khan. Yet you bash him for not fighting Thurman, whose best win was Guerrero up until two months ago. Go on.
    how am i all over the place? it was a terrible championship fight. herrera was supposed to be a soft touch after lucas, i understand that, his fight with lucas was tough. he ended up looking like shit. he looked like shit vs peterson too. he fought salka, malignaggi and guerrero, one horrible fight after the other. how was gonna guerrero test him? did you see his last fights prior garcia? he didn't look good in any of them. kamegai, thurman and martinez, he took a beating in all of them.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
      Nice try, but you won't get this fact to play for you.

      His father said it. There's no reason to fight Thurman or other top WW's, why? if we can make enough money fighting other people.

      As soon as Garcia KO's Bum Berto, they'll find a way to talk good about Danny. Feather fisted Mayweather almost puts Berto on the canvas in the last round.

      We complain because he's a World champion and should be looking to fight top opposition.
      Wow friend. You have ggg as your avi. He is the king of fighting mediocre opposition or taking fights that have overwhelming odds in his favor. I agree , if you say you are the best then you should fight the top fighters or at least upper level opposition. Ggg only fights soup cans.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Dean_Razorback View Post
        how am i all over the place? it was a terrible championship fight. herrera was supposed to be a soft touch after lucas, i understand that, his fight with lucas was tough. he ended up looking like shit. he looked like shit vs peterson too. he fought salka, malignaggi and guerrero, one horrible fight after the other. how was gonna guerrero test him? did you see his last fights prior garcia? he didn't look good in any of them. kamegai, thurman and martinez, he took a beating in all of them.
        Garcia-Guerrero wasn't terrible no matter what you say. Like I said, you keep bashing Garcia for that yet call on him to fight a Thurman whose best win was Guerrero up until two months ago. Herrera, the soft touch, is one of the better fighters at 140 and has proven it. Peterson was a top five contender and proved himself to be a worthy challnger that night, wouldn't you say? Or do the outcomes not matter to you?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
          According to NSB, Danny Garcia isn't that good, overrated, will get beat by all the top welters, yada yada. Why then complain when he's fighting guys cloer to his "level"?
          I think you got it mixed up, you mean Manny Pacquiao not Danny Garcia

          Comment


          • #25
            Danny does appear to fight down to the level of opposition, so while I'd expect him to win clearly, I won't expect it to be easy.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by hectari View Post
              I think you got it mixed up, you mean Manny Pacquiao not Danny Garcia
              No confusion at all.

              Comment


              • #27
                He would be incredibly easy for Garcia. Berto is immobile, has poor defense, and bad output. Garcia could pick and choose what he wants to hit Berto with for as long as Berto could take it.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  Garcia-Guerrero wasn't terrible no matter what you say. Like I said, you keep bashing Garcia for that yet call on him to fight a Thurman whose best win was Guerrero up until two months ago. Herrera, the soft touch, is one of the better fighters at 140 and has proven it. Peterson was a top five contender and proved himself to be a worthy challnger that night, wouldn't you say? Or do the outcomes not matter to you?
                  thurman is another champion and both should be held at the same standard, a fight with thurman is way better than berto, why wait? peterson was the most credible fight he had since lucas and still he managed to look bad. herrera was a cherry pick gone wrong if not explain why did they go after salka next? what was the point of that fight? how was guerrero supossed to be a good fight when garcia was coming from a dull performance vs malignaggi (was paulie supposed to be another hard test) and he was coming from 3 fights in a row were he looked terrible (he should have lost to martinez)

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Danny is a puss not willing to fight anyone good nobody is ducking him Thurman wants him both in the same division yet that cowardly diva wants to fight a washed up bum.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      So rod the god salka and peterson @142 then bum guerrero at 147 and now berto. But hes barely getting adjusted to 147. They baby the **** out this kid

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP