Crawford #3 P4P by TBRB

[PivotandRoll]

Crawford is #1 for me.

Why do you guys call it a P4P list when you mean accomplishment list?

[PivotandRoll]

Lemieux isn't even as good as Matthysse let alone Postol lol..... not surprised you'd think otherwise though with your GGG avatar and sig.

Postol was AT WORST the number 2 JWW behind Crawford. Neither Lemieux or Geale have ever been that high on the middleweight rankings. Geale has a disputed win over Sturm, that's saying something cause Murray and Macklin were more deserving of the W than he was, he lost to Darren Barker too.

Mate please save yourself the embarrassment, Postol is undoubtedly a better win than either Lemieux or Geale.

Broner >Postol....And possibly Rances> Postol...but yeah he's far better than any GGG win.

[NaijaD]

I already schooled the troll in another thread but he ran away and didn't reply. But btw, Golovkin is much more than just a power puncher.

He's not just a power puncher but he's far more reliant on that than anything Crawford is, that's my point. That alone tells me Crawford is more talented.

[_Maxi]

yea, pretty obvious........p4p number 3 seems right. i got into a argument about golovkin being higher then crawford. how? the dudes resume ****s all over golovkins and he has the same if not better consistency. the postol fight wasn't even close..........thats insane. lets be honest that postol fighter should have been more competitive but crawford just had a break out performance.


guy is doing things that would set him up as a hall of famer even this early. respect is earned and he's earned his respect.

But you don't have a problem with Kovalev being top2 do you? who has he beaten? 50 years old Hopkins? wow, what an achievement. Shot pascal? top10 LHW at best. How many top10 has GGG beaten? many. How many champions have ran away from GGG? many.

What am I saying, in case you're short minded, is that Golovkin and Kovalev have similar resumes, and I'd say Golovkin has a better one. Yet you people don't have a problem with Kovalev being P4P. Why the double standard? simple, you don't hate on Kovalev, that's why you are objective about him. But you do hate on GGG.

[aldo5408]

But you don't have a problem with Kovalev being top2 do you? who has he beaten? 50 years old Hopkins? wow, what an achievement. Shot pascal? top10 LHW at best. How many top10 has GGG beaten? many. How many champions have ran away from GGG? many.

What am I saying, in case you're short minded, is that Golovkin and Kovalev have similar resumes, and I'd say Golovkin has a better one. Yet you people don't have a problem with Kovalev being P4P. Why the double standard? simple, you don't hate on Kovalev, that's why you are objective about him. But you do hate on GGG.

That old Hopkins is better than anyone gg has beaten Kov is a boxer you can actually respect

[_Maxi]

That old Hopkins is better than anyone gg has beaten Kov is a boxer you can actually respect

Aldo sometimes you wanna troll and you end up being ******ed. Have some respect for ******ed people.

[cork]

He's not just a power puncher but he's far more reliant on that than anything Crawford is, that's my point. That alone tells me Crawford is more talented.

Not gonna argue who deserves to be higher but how is ggg reliant on power? Just because he have power doesn't mean he's reliant on it. Ggg barely lose rounds in fact you can probably count on two hands how many rounds ggg lost in his pro career and most of the rounds he loses because he wants to make it a fight for the fan instead of just doing what he normally does. You don't win in the amateur because of power.

[SilverMiles]

Lemieux isn't even as good as Matthysse let alone Postol lol..... not surprised you'd think otherwise though with your GGG avatar and sig.

Postol was AT WORST the number 2 JWW behind Crawford. Neither Lemieux or Geale have ever been that high on the middleweight rankings. Geale has a disputed win over Sturm, that's saying something cause Murray and Macklin were more deserving of the W than he was, he lost to Darren Barker too.

Mate please save yourself the embarrassment, Postol is undoubtedly a better win than either Lemieux or Geale.

Geale was ranked #2 at MW for years so that's not entirely true.

[kiaba360]

People are always busy arguing about order/placement, but look at the list from a political standpoint: 7 of the 10 boxers on TBRB's list fight on HBO, and the list has no PBC fighters. The Ring's list is the same way, but they have Loma instead of Bradley.

[LacedUp]

Beating a 126lber at 135lbs with a year and a bit layoff and coming off of steroids isn't impressive.

Only trolls would try and dispute Postol being better than Lemieux, Murray, Geale and so on, pathetic trolls.

Burns, Beltran, Gamboa, Dulorme, Jean and now Postol.

That's a great deal better than anything GGG has done.