Crawford #3 P4P by TBRB

[M Bison]

I think Postol is a better single win than anything Golovkin has thus far, I don't think anyone can dispute that but in terms of volume of good wins I think GGG has the edge. However most people tend to favour best wins over number of good wins when it comes to P4P lists.

Unfortunately GGG doesn't have a number 2 guy willing to fight him at 160, that can garner sympathy but it can't get him a pass on the p4p list.

Your continued bias is so shocking at times, I worry that you think you're being objective. Yes Gamboa was at his best at 126 but at the time he fought Crawford he was way past being able to make that weight, Crawford was not his only fight at 135 either. In the end Gamboa was undersized but no need to make it sound like he got dragged up 9 pounds for a one and done fight with TC.

What win does Postol have that makes him better than Lemieux or Geale?

[NaijaD]

What win does Postol have that makes him better than Lemieux or Geale?

Lemieux isn't even as good as Matthysse let alone Postol lol..... not surprised you'd think otherwise though with your GGG avatar and sig.

Postol was AT WORST the number 2 JWW behind Crawford. Neither Lemieux or Geale have ever been that high on the middleweight rankings. Geale has a disputed win over Sturm, that's saying something cause Murray and Macklin were more deserving of the W than he was, he lost to Darren Barker too.

Mate please save yourself the embarrassment, Postol is undoubtedly a better win than either Lemieux or Geale.

[bojangles1987]

Damn, they have Estrada way up there.

[M Bison]

Lemieux isn't even as good as Matthysse let alone Postol lol..... not surprised you'd think otherwise though with your GGG avatar and sig.

Postol was AT WORST the number 2 JWW behind Crawford. Neither Lemieux or Geale have ever been that high on the middleweight rankings. Geale has a disputed win over Sturm, that's saying something cause Murray and Macklin were more deserving of the W than he was, he lost to Darren Barker too.

Mate please save yourself the embarrassment, Postol is undoubtedly a better win than either Lemieux or Geale.

Neither Lemieux or Geale had that chance with GGG dominating and with Canelo and Cotto not making a joke of the MW division Lemieux would have been number 2 ranked.
Fact is you need to stop being so biased in favour of American fighters I know because of the Yank flag it tends to push fighters higher than ever but honestly, Crawford one isn't anywhere near as talented as GGG and two he hasn't fought anywhere near as good that and when he did step up he put on a stinker of a boring fight.

Geale was mugged off against Barker tbh but Barker is a pretty good fighter that sadly injuries got to hence his loss to Sturm.

Time to stop buying into American propoganda in boxing.

[Street]

#3 is fair

C'mon Arum, feed him Pacquiao. Beating him will make Terence your next PPV draw. Money, money, money. You have to sacrafice the old for the new

[Alx.]

Pretty good list, i agree with Crawford being number three but why is Alvarez on the list?

[jas]

My list:

1. Ward
2. Ggg
3. Kova
4. Gonzalez
5. Pacquaio
6. Lomachenko
7. Crawford
8. Rigondeaux
9. Inoue
10. Canelo

[Eff Pandas]

Pound for pound is a silly ass bs fantasyland scifi concept where ever Crawford or anyone else is supposedly ranked.

[NaijaD]

Neither Lemieux or Geale had that chance with GGG dominating and with Canelo and Cotto not making a joke of the MW division Lemieux would have been number 2 ranked.
Fact is you need to stop being so biased in favour of American fighters I know because of the Yank flag it tends to push fighters higher than ever but honestly, Crawford one isn't anywhere near as talented as GGG and two he hasn't fought anywhere near as good that and when he did step up he put on a stinker of a boring fight.

Geale was mugged off against Barker tbh but Barker is a pretty good fighter that sadly injuries got to hence his loss to Sturm.

Time to stop buying into American propoganda in boxing.

Bro log off your PC please... What are you basing that on?

GGG is a bigger puncher than TC but that doesn't equate to him being more talented, If you take away Golovkin's Power you have basically handicapped him in the ring, with Crawford you can't take away any one ability that will leave him as an average fighter. That to me says Crawford is more talented.

We haven't even seen GGG face any sort of adversity or adjust to an opponent because so far Plan A has never failed, can the man fight going backwards? What happens when his power is not enough?

I am not american, I live in London so I don't gain anything from pushing the "american propaganda". I call it as I see it and Crawford is the real deal, he's no Floyd Mayweather but he is an excellent boxer. American Propaganda is anyone who advocates for Deontay Wilder lol.

[M Bison]

Bro log off your PC please... What are you basing that on?

GGG is a bigger puncher than TC but that doesn't equate to him being more talented, If you take away Golovkin's Power you have basically handicapped him in the ring, with Crawford you can't take away any one ability that will leave him as an average fighter. That to me says Crawford is more talented.

We haven't even seen GGG face any sort of adversity or adjust to an opponent because so far Plan A has never failed, can the man fight going backwards? What happens when his power is not enough?

I am not american, I live in London so I don't gain anything from pushing the "american propaganda". I call it as I see it and Crawford is the real deal, he's no Floyd Mayweather but he is an excellent boxer. American Propaganda is anyone who advocates for Deontay Wilder lol.