Crawfords getting way overrated
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Khabib is ridiculously far behind Crawford or any other top welterweight or super lightweight. That fight proves absolutely nothing.
All I have to do is point to how badly Malignaggi's boxing skills bothered Broner. And not even prime Paulie, but a past it Paulie that arguably lost his last fight to Pablo Cesar Cano. That guy almost beat Broner. Crawford is so much better at the things Paulie did in that fight that Broner would be lucky to win 2 rounds. That's without even bringing up that Maidana and Porter not only beat Broner, they beat him easily. Porter boxed his head off. Has Broner ever beaten anyone as good as Postol or Gamboa? Come on.
Broner has zero functional advantages against Crawford. He isn't faster, he isn't stronger, he isn't more skilled, he isn't more talented, and Crawford's style is an absolute nightmare for him. he probably doesn't even have more power. What in the world could he do to beat Crawford?
None of Crawford's opponents punch like AB. Crawford doesn't have the best defense, he has skills but he's not super fast or doesn't punch super hard. Broners been in with the better fighters and is bigger. Crawford has a lot of holes that Broner could exploit.
Broner beat Paulie's ass too that fight wasn't close.Last edited by Adonis Creed; 07-26-2016, 12:38 PM.Comment
-
He's definitely being overrated but i still have him comfortably in my top 5 p4p. I think he can continue to dominate at 140 but if he ever goes up against the big dogs at 147 he'd probably go 1-1 which is still insanely impressive considering he started at 135.Comment
-
Yeah pretty much this. With the Postol fight Crawford showed me just how good his movement and footwork can be, which would spell nightmares for the flat-footed, pot-shotting Broner. Maybe it was on this board, but I certainly don't recall a lot of people saying Broner would lose to Khabib.Khabib is ridiculously far behind Crawford or any other top welterweight or super lightweight. That fight proves absolutely nothing.
All I have to do is point to how badly Malignaggi's boxing skills bothered Broner. And not even prime Paulie, but a past it Paulie that arguably lost his last fight to Pablo Cesar Cano. That guy almost beat Broner. Crawford is so much better at the things Paulie did in that fight that Broner would be lucky to win 2 rounds. That's without even bringing up that Maidana and Porter not only beat Broner, they beat him easily. Porter boxed his head off. Has Broner ever beaten anyone as good as Postol or Gamboa? Come on.
Broner has zero functional advantages against Crawford. He isn't faster, he isn't stronger, he isn't more skilled, he isn't more talented, and Crawford's style is an absolute nightmare for him. he probably doesn't even have more power. What in the world could he do to beat Crawford?
Crawford IMO is getting the love he deserves and is where he should be in peoples mind. A very good fighter on the verge of being great. So many out there (despite the odds) called this as a close 50/50 type fight. To then go back and say Postol was nothing just because Terence made him look like nothing is disingenuous. Similarly Broner is regarded as he should be, a good fighter that may have had the potential to be great, but is too stubborn/dimwitted to realize it.Comment
-
I mean he's 2x lineal champ already. It's not like he'd be a fav to beat manny and he's def not the next floydComment
-
So this may be a ****** question, but if he is comfortably in your top 5 p4p, how is it exactly he is being overrated? I don't see a ton of calls for him being listed as GOAT/ATG, so how much higher are people rating him?Comment
Comment