Originally posted by Dosumpthin
View Post
You mean su****ious like vampire a facial?
Or could it be the DCO doing his ****ing job like he is trained to when it's necessary for the athlete to hydrate in order to complete a. full urine sample.
[Comment to G.4.6: It is the responsibility of the Athlete to provide a Sample
with a Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis. If his/her first Sample is too
dilute, he/she should not need further hydration and therefore should avoid
drinking as far as possible until a Sample with a Suitable Specific Gravity for
Analysis is provided. The DCO should wait as long as necessary to collect
such a Sample. The Testing Authority may specify procedures to be followed
by the DCO in determining whether exceptional circumstances exist that
make it impossible to continue with the Sample Collection Session.]
- WADA ISTI
Wrong for two reasons both due to your lack of knowledgeable fact based information.
1.) the dco will wait until the athlete is able to provide a suitable sample of the urine sample is too dilute because of overhydration. That's your first mistake.
Annex G - Urine Samples that do not meet the
requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis
G.4 Requirements
G.4.1 The DCO shall determine that the requirements for Suitable Specific
Gravity for Analysis have not been met.
G.4.2 The DCO shall inform the Athlete that he/she is required to provide a
further Sample.
G.4.3 While waiting to provide a further Sample, the Athlete shall remain
under continuous observation.
G.4.4 The Athlete shall be advised not to hydrate excessively, since this
may delay the production of a suitable Sample. In appropriate circumstances,
excessive hydration may be pursued as a violation of Code Article 2.5
(Tampering or Attempted Tampering with any part of Doping Control).
G.4.5 When the Athlete is able to provide an additional Sample, the DCO
shall repeat the procedures for Sample collection set out in Annex D –
Collection of Urine Samples.
G.4.6 The DCO should continue to collect additional Samples until the
requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis is met, or until the DCO
determines that there are exceptional circumstances which mean that for
logistical reasons it is impossible to continue with the Sample Collection Session. Such exceptional circumstances shall be documented accordingly by
the DCO.
6 hours you say? Sounds like the dco did a good job. He should be applauded.
2.) wada acredited labs VERIFY THE URINE SAMPLE COLLECTION MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS such as volume and specific gravity or else they will not count the sample. They submit results of the sample and abp analysis into the ADAMS system. If the values are distorted, the system will alert them of a su****ious sample and the lab follows through with additional procedures.
Its a checks and balances process from there involving multiple en****** and a long paper trail.
Ultimately without a tue, atheletes can possibly be charged with an ANTI DOPING VIOLATION - all because of "distorted values".
So you've been factually proven wrong.
The ABP intends to establish that an Athlete is manipulating his/her physiological
variables, without necessarily relying on the detection of a particular Prohibited
Substance or Prohibited Method.
- WADA Athlete Biological Passport
Operating Guidelines
An athelete can be charged with an ANTI DOPING RULE VIOLATION for distorted abp results that are inconsistent, spiked or dropped off compared to an atheletes own historical values.
I get it. I know. Athletes can microdose epo right into their skin and go undetected. 20 ways to beat any test. Got it.
The mantra is to accuse all powerfull Floyd with unlimited funds given to the best in the business to beat a ped test. In your effort prove Floyd has access to undetectable designer drugs, you prove iv isn't needed to beat the test.
That was you answer as to how he beat all the other test without the iv.
You claim the iv was necessary because they didn't expect the DCO.
So 19 years, 47 fights, all powerful Floyd and team is not expecting a urine test the day before a fight. Really?
Agreed.
No need for an iv to mask then.
No you don't. You don't even understand how the BIO PASSORT is utilized.
Take some time and read WADAS athlete biological passport operations guide.
Stop with the half truths.
Passport thingy? You seem very knowledgeable regarding the issue. Tell me more.
Wrong.
USADA determined lance used a blood tranfusion through the analysis of his passport.
Fact.
Research the latest news on "Lance Armstrong abp samples" and get back to me. I already gave you a link a couple pages ago. And I have more.
Step your game up pact@rd. Your conspiracy theories are unraveling at the seems. Way too big.
Simple fact, Floyd notified USADA in ADVANCE. Big difference than Hauser initial reported lie. Big difference.
Or could it be the DCO doing his ****ing job like he is trained to when it's necessary for the athlete to hydrate in order to complete a. full urine sample.
[Comment to G.4.6: It is the responsibility of the Athlete to provide a Sample
with a Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis. If his/her first Sample is too
dilute, he/she should not need further hydration and therefore should avoid
drinking as far as possible until a Sample with a Suitable Specific Gravity for
Analysis is provided. The DCO should wait as long as necessary to collect
such a Sample. The Testing Authority may specify procedures to be followed
by the DCO in determining whether exceptional circumstances exist that
make it impossible to continue with the Sample Collection Session.]
- WADA ISTI
Wrong for two reasons both due to your lack of knowledgeable fact based information.
1.) the dco will wait until the athlete is able to provide a suitable sample of the urine sample is too dilute because of overhydration. That's your first mistake.
Annex G - Urine Samples that do not meet the
requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis
G.4 Requirements
G.4.1 The DCO shall determine that the requirements for Suitable Specific
Gravity for Analysis have not been met.
G.4.2 The DCO shall inform the Athlete that he/she is required to provide a
further Sample.
G.4.3 While waiting to provide a further Sample, the Athlete shall remain
under continuous observation.
G.4.4 The Athlete shall be advised not to hydrate excessively, since this
may delay the production of a suitable Sample. In appropriate circumstances,
excessive hydration may be pursued as a violation of Code Article 2.5
(Tampering or Attempted Tampering with any part of Doping Control).
G.4.5 When the Athlete is able to provide an additional Sample, the DCO
shall repeat the procedures for Sample collection set out in Annex D –
Collection of Urine Samples.
G.4.6 The DCO should continue to collect additional Samples until the
requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis is met, or until the DCO
determines that there are exceptional circumstances which mean that for
logistical reasons it is impossible to continue with the Sample Collection Session. Such exceptional circumstances shall be documented accordingly by
the DCO.
6 hours you say? Sounds like the dco did a good job. He should be applauded.
2.) wada acredited labs VERIFY THE URINE SAMPLE COLLECTION MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS such as volume and specific gravity or else they will not count the sample. They submit results of the sample and abp analysis into the ADAMS system. If the values are distorted, the system will alert them of a su****ious sample and the lab follows through with additional procedures.
Its a checks and balances process from there involving multiple en****** and a long paper trail.
Ultimately without a tue, atheletes can possibly be charged with an ANTI DOPING VIOLATION - all because of "distorted values".
So you've been factually proven wrong.
The ABP intends to establish that an Athlete is manipulating his/her physiological
variables, without necessarily relying on the detection of a particular Prohibited
Substance or Prohibited Method.
- WADA Athlete Biological Passport
Operating Guidelines
An athelete can be charged with an ANTI DOPING RULE VIOLATION for distorted abp results that are inconsistent, spiked or dropped off compared to an atheletes own historical values.
I get it. I know. Athletes can microdose epo right into their skin and go undetected. 20 ways to beat any test. Got it.
The mantra is to accuse all powerfull Floyd with unlimited funds given to the best in the business to beat a ped test. In your effort prove Floyd has access to undetectable designer drugs, you prove iv isn't needed to beat the test.
That was you answer as to how he beat all the other test without the iv.
You claim the iv was necessary because they didn't expect the DCO.
So 19 years, 47 fights, all powerful Floyd and team is not expecting a urine test the day before a fight. Really?
Agreed.
No need for an iv to mask then.
No you don't. You don't even understand how the BIO PASSORT is utilized.
Take some time and read WADAS athlete biological passport operations guide.
Stop with the half truths.
Passport thingy? You seem very knowledgeable regarding the issue. Tell me more.
Wrong.
USADA determined lance used a blood tranfusion through the analysis of his passport.
Fact.
Research the latest news on "Lance Armstrong abp samples" and get back to me. I already gave you a link a couple pages ago. And I have more.
Step your game up pact@rd. Your conspiracy theories are unraveling at the seems. Way too big.
Simple fact, Floyd notified USADA in ADVANCE. Big difference than Hauser initial reported lie. Big difference.
Comment