Did Floyd Mayweather use PED's? (simple answer for an OG member please)

[HeroBando]

It's not false.

FIRST AND FOREMOST : USADA is the ONLY WADA signatory that test fighters and this is so because of Floyd. FACT.

He also indirectly paved the way for VADA, a cheap knock off of USADA whose rules only mirror WADA code, but at least they provide more stringent testing than boxing commissions.

Prior to Floyd's heroism and leading the charge for better testing, ADOs weren't even discussing testing fighters year round.


So once again thank Floyd for introducing WADA code and exposing pacquiao in the process.

Secondly : what you just wrote is logically flawed.
USADA, being an official signatory, adheres to the WADA code. Floyd "fighting in vegas" because NSAC allowed him to cheat is irrelevant when Floyd and his opponent are still required to meet WADA testing protocols.

Last but not least : the whole only fights in vegas is nothing more than pre may2nd pact@rd propaganda accusing Floyd of using lidocaine and and higher t/e ratios both allowed by NSAC.

BUT PACT@RDS FAIL TO UPDATE THEIR PROPAGANDA - pacquiao used lidocaine as one of the FIVE drugs listed on his pre fight form. And WADA has their own acceptable t/e ratios along with the athletes BIOLOGICAL PASSPORT.


So do some research ****** pact@rd, your old rhetoric is outdated.

Usada broke Wadas rule to issue that retroactive Tue on behalf of the guy who's contracting them. Just as you'd expect with such a blatant conflict of interest

[Dosumpthin]

Only a fool will say no or a bit hugger

They took a medicine that hides drugs, the same medicine used by drug users like lance Armstrong to hide positive tests

Not only that but he took 14
Times the required limit of that Iv drip given to someone in critical condition in the Fckn hospital lol

What more red flags do you people need

He is a cheat and his legacy is forever ruined because of it

****** pact@rd. 50mil to someone in critical condition?

[Dosumpthin]

Usada broke Wadas rule to issue that retroactive Tue on behalf of the guy who's contracting them. Just as you'd expect with such a blatant conflict of interest

Well being the at USADA is a WADA signatory - WADA has complete authority to review and REVERSE the "illegal" retroactive Tue.


I'm still waiting. It's been over a year. USADA broke the rules. WADA has the ability to fix it.


Or does Floyd have WADA on the payroll as well?


Pact@rd.


One iv can't beat 22 cir test and a ABP.

Try again. Hater.

[Lester Tutor]

Where do you see Hauser in that post? Don't need Hauser, just use common sense you lowlife. Got any?

If it was common sense then industry writers all affiliated with the BWAA would've written many (amplified) articles back on May 22nd when Kevin Iole specifically wrote about Floyd's IV due to dehydration. Kevin Iole writes sentences later stating Floyd was tested afterwards as well. Was Kevin Iole paid off?

Why Hauser you ask? He started the whole conspiracy theory. Even when Hauser (with surely no conflicts of interest associated to HBO), was again shut down by Iole when he wrote about Haymon.

This is the reason why American sports Authority doesn't respect boxing, because the people mainly writing about it have the historical authority which supersedes even what sports networks say or broadcast about it. sadly, they are so misinformed they lean towards consultancy towards such organization (BWAA) when in fact they should be objective more than anything and without favoritism. Hence, "Boxer Of The Decade." Ring itself is highly criticized here.

[Lester Tutor]

****** pact@rd. 50mil to someone in critical condition?

athletes can easily pass out from exhaustion or over exertion. It is known for soccer players to literally die on the field during play. Be it a heart condition or stress, including American Football players, many factors of exhaustion or a body's threshold that there's a point of collapse.

Now, with all that being said, why can't an athlete have the right to watch over his own health? Especially when it's considered a mega fight in sports with multi millions at the line, how does a regular bloke assume that general liquids via intestinal filtration to the blood has any advantage over IV? Needles into a vein are always risky in general for the sheer fact of a bubble... Also, since the advent of new medicine INTO the blood stream, the reliefs are instantaneous. When someone's dying of toxins or poison you insert an anti something that acts quickly into the bloodstream. This is the same concept of intravenous. Fast Relief! I said this a thousands times, anybody who has had an IV in their life, can acknowledge the relief within 40min of its treatment. I had a rash once from some coli bacteria that had red bumps all over my body, constant itching and pain, went to the hospital, IV, after 40 min. I was feeling pimp!

Therefore, Floyd has every right as long as his medical condition has a REALISTIC justification, ESPECIALLY when anti-dope testing in 2015 is monitoring procedures to EPO, CIR, and HGH to name a few, the most common in PEDs.

Of course the medical world would not advocate GENERAL use or a standard method over oral intake since IV is costly and with a higher risk. This is the sole reason why it's not advised, and that context will never be exclusive to May vs Pac as a reference...

[b00g13man]

This went as well as expected.

[HeroBando]

Well being the at USADA is a WADA signatory - WADA has complete authority to review and REVERSE the "illegal" retroactive Tue.


I'm still waiting. It's been over a year. USADA broke the rules. WADA has the ability to fix it.


Or does Floyd have WADA on the payroll as well?


Pact@rd.


One iv can't beat 22 cir test and a ABP.

Try again. Hater.

Wada has no role in pro boxing, dumbfcuk. Usada is not supervised by anyone when hired by a fighter or promoter.

There's really no question if they broke the retroactive Tue rule. They did, you just have to read the rules, it's open and shut

[HeroBando]

If it was common sense then industry writers all affiliated with the BWAA would've written many (amplified) articles back on May 22nd when Kevin Iole specifically wrote about Floyd's IV due to dehydration. Kevin Iole writes sentences later stating Floyd was tested afterwards as well. Was Kevin Iole paid off?

Why Hauser you ask? He started the whole conspiracy theory. Even when Hauser (with surely no conflicts of interest associated to HBO), was again shut down by Iole when he wrote about Haymon.

This is the reason why American sports Authority doesn't respect boxing, because the people mainly writing about it have the historical authority which supersedes even what sports networks say or broadcast about it. sadly, they are so misinformed they lean towards consultancy towards such organization (BWAA) when in fact they should be objective more than anything and without favoritism. Hence, "Boxer Of The Decade." Ring itself is highly criticized here.

What's all this garbage? I don't need Hauser to interpret the clear cut rule, or to realize they broke it. It says no retroactive Tue for home visits, case closed

[DeadLikeMe]

Most likely.

[Lester Tutor]

What's all this garbage? I don't need Hauser to interpret the clear cut rule, or to realize they broke it. It says no retroactive Tue for home visits, case closed

Right... that's why it took 3 months for only Hauser to publicize it yet not a single soul did even after Kevin Iole adddressed it on May 22nd. Lol

Dont make it too easy