Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Golovkin Will Eventually Move Up To 168, Maybe 175
Collapse
-
The thing about Hopkins record is, he made 75% of those defenses without anybody really giving a ****. And it was because the competition was so bad. Only after he beat Tito did any of that **** matter to folks. And GGG's string of defenses are against significantly weaker opposition that what Hopkins faced. He needs a signature fight. And for him right now, that means going to light heavy and beating the Ward-Kovalev winner. I mean, even after the wins over Tito and DLH, a lotta people still weren't sold on B-Hop as a true ATG. Tarver is what cemented him in a lotta people's minds.Comment
-
Fighting weight and natural weight 2 different things.Comment
-
I agree the Lemieux fight was the perfect time to move up instead of wasting away at 160 fighting the Wade's of the world. At that point he could of jumped up to 168 and fought a Froch or someone of that caliber but instead he will be fighting a WW.Comment
-
-
All Golovkin's defences of the WBA title are 100% legit. To any fair minded fan, that is, which rules you out, of course.
The WBA were bribed by Felix Sturm's promoters to reintroduce a "super" title at MW and award it to Sturm to allow him to avoid fighting GGG, who had been his mando for 2 years.
The WBA broke their own rules by doing that. Their "super" titles were supposed to be awarded only to unified champs, and Sturm wasn't a unified champ.
GGG has been the WBA middleweight champion since 2010, and all his defences since then are legit.
nah, you're just a jock-sniffing fanboy !
Golovkin was only the INTERIM champ, just like Jacobs is now.
Daniel Geale was the WBA " Super " champion...... not Golovkin.
He beat Sturm back in 2012.
2 fighters OBVIOUSLY cannot defend the WBA title simultaneously.
Golovkin's " defences " back when he was the interim " champ "..... were as legitimate as Jacobs "defences" are now..... 0.
That is about as ****** as crediting Pacquiao for winning a FW title, despite the fact that did not. Beating Barrera in a non-title fight, does not magically award Pacquiao a featherweight simply because you feel all warm and gooey inside whenever you look at your Pac poster..... and by the same token, Golovkin's INTERIM defences do not count as legitimate defences, just because you got that creepy man-love thing going on.
Only a dopey fanboy would co-sign the WBA's sanctioning fee scam.
get help !Comment
-
he is no where near a record..would be in his 40s in order to break them.....20 full title defenses of an alphabet title (no regular, no interim dont count)...14 lineal title defenses is the record by Carlos Monzon
unify then move up to secure his legacy...160 is a waste of time at this point for him
exactly !
Golovkin's " record " is not legit.
But the thing is this.....
1) even if some modern-day scribes recognize his "reign", most will not..... and in the future, Golovkin's run of defences will have a big asterisk next to it.
2) it comes down to 1 thing..... WHO you fought, with consideration given to when/how...... and that is all..... and no amount of ***wittery will cover that up.Comment
-
^^^ Right...
... but if Ward somehow beats Kovalev don't be surprised when GGG calls him out for those belts at 175... (of course, this in case: 1) Ward actually fights Kovalev; 2) Kovalev doesn't have a "rematch clause" in that supposed Ward contract; 3) Wrad doesn't 'retire' again after that supposed win over Kovalev.)
sure he will bro
Comment
-
Comment
-
nah, that is what you whisper to yourself every night to help you sleep
btw kid, the wheel has fallen off your "avoided killer who can beat anyone from 154-168" wagon..... he ducked Ward at 168 just like he ducked Canelo at 155.
best you hurry along now and go find yourself a new lie to believe
in the real world, you guys simply could not be that ******..... and yet, here we are LMAOComment
Comment