Anyone else fancy a rewatch of this barnburner?
Look Back In Anger: Rereviewing Calzaghe vs. Hopkins
Collapse
-
I had Calzaghe winning by about a round. It was an awful fight that i'd never really want to see again.
I also believe Hopkins was really hurt by a body shot and faked a low blow that wasn't low at all.Comment
-
CompuBox is a joke. Simply a company used to help sway viewer opinion of the fight. Video analysis of the fight shows that Calzaghe didn't land more than 50 punches, literally.Comment
-
Sarcasm right? You can divide CompuBox's total number of punches landed by Calzaghe by four, and it would still be more punches than Calzaghe actually landed in the fight.Comment
-
Like most people on first watch without overanalyzing it or thinking too much about landed punches, just watching how they looked, I thought Calzaghe edged him. Then like everyone else, with the slowmotion, gifs, and another replay I can see a case for B-Hop. It could have gone either way, but I understand what the judges saw and why they scored it the way they didComment
-
-
Compubox is worth less than **** to me in general. It's not the ams, you don't score on landed shots, that's not (quite) how it works, there are more factors than that. The kid posting it is a great troll, though, and you're all biting.
I could understand the judges walking out halfway through and going "**** this."Like most people on first watch without overanalyzing it or thinking too much about landed punches, just watching how they looked, I thought Calzaghe edged him. Then like everyone else, with the slowmotion, gifs, and another replay I can see a case for B-Hop. It could have gone either way, but I understand what the judges saw and why they scored it the way they didComment
-
Usually fights this close warrant a rematch.
Thankfully we never got one.
I had Calzaghe winning when I saw it, but it was very close. Even with the knockdown, the fight should have been a draw. Neither fighter deserved to win.Comment
Comment