Originally posted by lefthooklead
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Brook's Challenge of Golovkin Shows Signs of 1980s Greatness
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by MASTERBX View PostLeonard, Duran, and Hearns actually had a legacy to consider when they fought at middle weight. lil g and Brook have NO legacy to consider in this travesty. That is way it is taking place. This is a MONEY fight NOT a legacy fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Code Red View PostWrong.....it shows signs of 2016 Canelo-Khan ******ity!!
this is complete and utter crud....nice way to try and pump it up...real fans know what a mismatch is
Comment
-
The initial disappointment has worn off for me, at the end of the day it's happening.
With that said, **** it, let's do this Kell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thack View PostGood post , my thoughts too.
size is not about height and reach
its about bone density, muscle density, girth, and mass
example.....Tyson was 5'11" with like a 72" reach ..the height and reach of a middleweight...so are he and GGG the same size??? imagine if cruiserweights were jumping up to fight tyson...murked
they are similar in height, not size.
GGG is the bigger guy and will be by at least 13 pounds fight night unless brook bulks up or just comes in soft
Comment
-
Unlike Khan, the undefeated Brook does not have a glass jaw and actually has good punching power and stamina. The outcome of this fight is not so predictable. And unlike Canelo-Khan, it's not pay-per-view!!! So stop whining about this fight!!!
Comment
-
The gamble of Legends
Had Mayweather chose to fight an undefeated GGG, and take the chance to lose his perfect record, he could have one buy points using is great defense. That would have propulse him into higher ranks in the all time great. Brook buy doing so, and who knows what can happen in a fight, might win. Although i would bet on GGG to KO him. But if Brook wins this fight, we will have the kind of champion we want since the eras of the great Legends.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostWhy do people keep bringing up Leonard, Duran, and Hearns? All three of those fighters had moved on from welterweight before fighting Hagler. All three had won titles in divisions above welterweight before fighting Hagler. They did not jump straight from welterweight to fight him.
The comparison is just wrong.Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post^^^^^^at least leonard, Benitez, Duran, and Hearns won titles at 147, and 154 before going to 160
Kell revealed yesterday that he can no longer make 147, and he's been tight at the IBF rehydration limit of 157 at noon on fight day since he won his title.
Comment
Comment