Real champs should look UP for a challenge and NOT DOWN

[Buckfever]

Old school thinking. Everything today is driven by money. What better money option did GGG have? He doesn't want Canelo for legacy, he knows he smokes him, it's about the money. Risk/reward nothing more.

[techliam]

Did you make a thread when Khan/Canelo was signed, Larry?

Why the sudden outrage now?

[SkillspayBills]

Lara's promoter: Can't do the fight, TV problems.

Twitter wars are not an official callout, look at Danny Jacobs' pathetic callout.

He had no other options at 160 and needs a name on his resume. Brook is a cherry pick but not as bad as canelo picking khan. Should have fought Lara though

This guy wasn't a real champ Larry? Damn

pacquaio was a flyweight FFS.


in larry's defense, he does not think when he types stuff.

I agree. It's a shame what Mayweather did to Marquez, Hatton...

The only guy I thought could beat him at 168 was Ward.

DeGale? I don't think so. Jack? Eh not really.


But let's not ignore the fact that

Jacobs-NO
BJS-NO
Canelo-Literally dumped his belt and went back to 154
Quillin-I don't even know where he is
Cotto-said no
Martinez-said no
Sturm-said no


I mean damn, now Eubank ran away too.

I want him to move up and fight Zurdo but he's out for 5 months with an injury.

Degale and Jack are unifying soon.



Screw it KO Brook and get it over.

Real champions should fight the best, GGG is fighting the best = Real Champions.

My problem with these BLATANT disgusting hypocrits is all the excuses they come up with when it is a fighter they are a fan of. If Canelo did the sa........actually Canelo did the same thing and THEY WERE THE FIRST to criticize him. No one on this site has any damn shame? ****ing pathetic.

[Larry the boss]

Did you make a thread when Khan/Canelo was signed, Larry?

Why the sudden outrage now?

Of course i ****ted all over that fight

[Mr.Fantastic]

Of course i ****ted all over that fight

And what about Marquez vs Floyd?

[_Maxi]

My problem with these BLATANT disgusting hypocrits is all the excuses they come up with when it is a fighter they are a fan of. If Canelo did the sa........actually Canelo did the same thing and THEY WERE THE FIRST to criticize him. No one on this site has any damn shame? ****ing pathetic.

You are pathetic. What's your IQ? 60? GGG didn't have more options. Brook is a big WW.

[-Hyperion-]

My problem with these BLATANT disgusting hypocrits is all the excuses they come up with when it is a fighter they are a fan of. If Canelo did the sa........actually Canelo did the same thing and THEY WERE THE FIRST to criticize him. No one on this site has any damn shame? ****ing pathetic.

it's not the same thing. Canelo had options for one. We KNEW Khan had a glass chin while Brook is not only bigger and stronger but a bit of an unknown quantity, which leaves a bit of intrigue. And I'm not a Golovkin fan, I don't even think he's that good but this fight is not all that bad considering the options available, that's all....I do think the people who ignore all the details that led to this(GGG avoided by Canelo-Jacobs-Saunders-Eubank) are BLATANTLY BIASED...

[Larry the boss]

larryxxx...

still wondering if you think Hagler, Monzon, Hopkins and co were great or not?

Hagler and Monzon fought in a era when there was no 168 division....Hopkins was slammed in his career for fighting smaller fighters as well, but he jumped 2 divisions at 40

[Larry the boss]

And what about Marquez vs Floyd?

Only thing that gets me wit that is..no floyd fan said it was great but somehow its a great win when Bradley and Manny beat an even older Marquez

[LoadedWraps]

I dont get how fans can support a fighter who NEVER LOOKS UP AND MAKES FIGHTS!!but always calls out SMALLER FIGHTERS!!!. and dont say Hagler as 168 was not around then and he would have had to go to 175. What happened to challenging yourself? This is the era of b1tchassness i see

You shoot yourself in the foot early here larryx. Doing something once, or twice, is not ALWAYS for you to say they NEVER do the opposite lol.

And why should one fighter be criticized, what about the credit to the "smaller" fighter for coming up? Clearly biased here.