Why isn't Bradley on the P4P list?

[Combat Talk Radio]

People are comedy on here.

A guy who has only ever lost against an ATG doesn't belong on a P4P list?

Sports Illustrated - now THEY KSAB. This is about right - the only flaw is having Rigo on there at all.

http://www.si.com/boxing/2016/02/01/february-boxing-rankings-gennady-golovkin-sergey-kovalev-canelo-alvarez-manny-pacquiao

I'll even take this one.

http://thecomeback.com/queensberryrules/2016-articles/pound-for-pound-top-20-boxers-update-516.html

Don't pay attention to The Ring. They lost their card when they put Rousey on the cover.

[therealpugilist]

He has a better resume than most of the boxers on the P4P list. His only two defeats have been to Pacquiao.

When Hopkins lost to Calzaghe, he wasn't removed. Neither did Marquez when he lost to Pacquiao.


Marquez
Peterson
Pacquiao - I thought he lost but to some he won the first fight.
Witter
Vazquez
Holt
Alexander
Holt
Provodnikov
Vargas
Rios
Chaves


He deserves to be top 5 easy. Everybody else fighting tune ups while Bradley stays consistent with challenges.

Because they have a couple fighters who dont belong. People have a style preference over a substance preference


IMO Bradley and Danny Garcia should be in or close to it.....it gets tougher at the top level and people hold it against them that they got a decision or two in their favor that some people dont like...so ****** they ignore the substance which is elite talent and deep resume

they've both fought a variety of styles and still remain near the top of their divisions. Both are two division titlists with a resume that craps on more hyped fighters

[marco55]

Garcia is all smoke and mirrors. He's fought nobody, and lost to Herrera but was gifted the home town decision. Any of 10 guys that he finally steps up to fight will beat him easily.