Originally posted by kafkod
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tyson Fury under investigation for steroid use
Collapse
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostDepends upon how a ban would be enforced. One thing is for sure though and that is that this is a mess (if true).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post^Was waiting for this sort of thing. I actually hope Fury is innocent. But, many members of the Fury fanbase have been beyond obnoxious around here. It's always a joy when ill behaved clowns get put in their place. Maybe some of them will learn the value of showing grace in victory.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott.Weiland. View PostIn all likelihood he took the drugs to try win as he knew he couldn't beat Klitschko and was going to retire anyway afterwards, the rematch clause he probably never gave any thought to as he never believed for a moment Klitschko wouldn't throw a right hand all night.
For all the foul cry Fury & his team did about the ring cushion,the gloves, the taping & the being drugged post fight, it is them who are in this position.. Smh..Last edited by BoxingFan85; 06-27-2016, 11:26 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThis whole story sounds like bollocks to me.
What would be the point of UKAD testing boxers then letting them keep on fighting for over a year without telling anybody about a positive result?
Not saying Fury's guilty mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThis whole story sounds like bollocks to me.
What would be the point of UKAD testing boxers then letting them keep on fighting for over a year without telling anybody about a positive result?
Its a dumb way of doing things in a sport which is so dangerous, but they did the same thing with Tony Thompson. He was able to fight a good few times in between failing a test and the press/public hearing about it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Rumack View PostLol at claims this is a Gay/***ish conspiracy
If he is popped for nando then he is dirty. No ifs, buts, or maybes. But it remains to be seen if he has in fact been popped.
Hennessy's statement is a bit weak considering the seriousness of the allegations.
If there was nothing to it they could debunk it in minutes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Superbee View PostThey do that all the time in any sports... Athletes will get shoved of their medals years after when samples are tested again with better detection techniques and hardware ..
This is not a new test on an old sample. According to the story, Tyson and Hughie produced these results in tests carried out early last year, and still only one UK newspaper knows anything about it!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View PostDidn't Tony Thompson do that?
Not saying Fury's guilty mind.Originally posted by Tom Cruise View PostUKAD dont release any info until all investigations and appeals are complete. We are only hearing about this now because it was leaked.
Its a dumb way of doing things in a sport which is so dangerous, but they did the same thing with Tony Thompson. He was able to fight a good few times in between failing a test and the press/public hearing about it
The delay was in announcing that Thompson had been banned, not in banning him.
The news only came out after the 18 month ban was completed. Even Price didn't know anything about it till then!
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...d-price-career
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View PostCan you imagine if it was Wlad who say was found guilty or if he had sprained his ankle & the fight had to postponed, what some of the silly Fury fans would have said?
For all the foul cry Fury & his team did about the ring cushion,the gloves, the taping & the being drugged post fight, it is them who are in this position.. Smh..
The ring their was nothing wrong with, it was the same as any German federation rules boxing ring. The gloves Fury knew which he would be allowed and what he was not,he agreed to all of this when he signed.
I wonder will Klitschko pursue legal action to be compensated for being cheated against.
Comment
Comment